We subjected the Oppo Find X6 Pro to our rigorous SBMARK audio test suite to measure its performance both when recording sound using its built-in microphones, and when playing audio through its speakers.

In this review, we’ll analyze how it performed in a variety of tests and several common use cases.

Overview


Key audio specs include:

  • Two speakers (top left, bottom right)
  • No audio jack output

Reproduction

Pros

  • Decent tonal balance
  • Good breadth

Against

  • Minimum volume level too low
  • Distortion and compression at maximum volume
  • Not enough punch

Registration

Pros

  • Natural and pleasant recordings
  • Excellent volume performance
  • Excellent handling of artifacts, clean recordings

Against

  • Serious lack of clarity in the recordings
  • Performance in the concert use case is a bit disappointing

The audio performance of the Oppo Find X6 Pro was very similar to its predecessor, the Find X5 Pro, with natural sounding audio but a lack of clarity and brilliance in both playback and recording.

Our experts found the Find X6 Pro’s recordings to be clean and loud enough, but clarity dropped noticeably at high volumes for both recording and playback. With its built-in speakers, the Find X6 Pro delivered fairly consistent results across all use cases, making it equally suitable for listening to music, watching movies, and playing games. When recording, it worked best with the main camera. That said, it was also a decent option for selfie camera and memo recordings.

Trial summary

Learn about SBMARK audio tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone audio reviews, SBMARK engineers perform a series of objective tests and undertake more than 20 hours of perceptual evaluation under controlled laboratory conditions.
(For more details on our playback protocol, click here; for more details on our recording protocol, click here.)

The following section compiles the key elements of our extensive testing and analysis performed in the SBMARK laboratories. Detailed performance evaluations in the form of reports are available upon request. Do not hesitate to contact us.

How the audio playback score is composed

SBMARK engineers test playback through smartphone speakers, the performance of which is evaluated in our labs and under real-life conditions, using apps and preset settings.

In playback, the Oppo Find X6 Pro offered a decent tonal balance, with natural-sounding highs and mids (although they lacked clarity and brightness), as well as good bass that lacked only low-frequency extension and roundness. Tonal balance was felt to be aggressive at max volume when listening to music and even more so when gaming, while at low volume the lack of clarity and brilliance was accentuated. In terms of dynamics, the attack was decent but could have been sharper. The device also delivered good bass accuracy and punch was okay but left no real impact. Dynamic qualities were preserved at low volume, but further flawed at maximum volume due to distortion and compression. The built-in speakers created a fairly large sound stage and provided quite precise and accurate localization of individual sound sources. However, voices tended to be heard further away than the comparison devices, and the rendering of soundstage depth could have been better.

Our experts found the minimum volume setting to be a little too low, with some softer content not being adequately audible. The maximum volume was quite loud, but the volume step distribution was slightly inconsistent. We did notice some distortion and compression at max volume, and the right speaker clogged too easily when holding the phone in landscape orientation. But the effects on playback quality were only minor.

Hear about the playback performance of the smartphone tested in this comparison with some of its competitors:

Recordings of smartphones playing some of our songs at 60 LAeq in an anechoic environment via 2 microphones in AB configuration, at 30 cm

Here’s how Oppo Find X6 Pro fares in playback use cases compared to its competitors:

Playback of use case scores

The Timbre score represents how well a phone reproduces sound across the audible tonal range and takes into account bass, mids, treble, tonal balance, and volume dependence. It is the most important attribute for reproduction.

Frequency response of music reproduction

A 1/12-octave frequency response graph, which measures the loudness of each frequency emitted by your smartphone as it reproduces a pure sine wave in an anechoic environment.

The Dynamics Score measures the accuracy of changes in the energy level of sound sources, such as how accurately a bass note or impact sound of drums is played.

Secondary attributes for spatial testing include pinpointing the location of a specific sound, its positional balance, distance, and amplitude.

The volume score represents the overall volume of a smartphone and how smoothly the volume increases and decreases based on user input.

Here are some sound pressure levels (SPL) measured while playing our sample recordings of hip-hop and classical music at maximum volume:

hip-hop Classic
Oppo Find X6 Pro 74.5 dBA 72.4 dBA
Oppo Find X5 Pro 76.1 dBA 71.8 dBA
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Snapdragon) 73.9 dBA 69.1 dBA

The following graph shows the gradual changes in volume from minimum to maximum. We expect these changes to be consistent across the range, so that all volume steps match user expectations:

Music volume consistency

This line graph shows the relative loudness of the playback versus the user selected volume step, measured at several volume steps with correlated pink noise in an anechoic box recorded 0.20 meter on axis.

The artifact score measures the extent to which the sound is affected by various types of distortion. The higher the score, the less noticeable sound disturbances are. Distortion can occur due to the sound processing in the device and the quality of the speakers.

Playback Total Harmonic Distortion (maximum volume)

This graph shows total harmonic distortion and noise over the audible frequency range.
It represents the distortion and noise of the device playing our test signal (0 dB Fs, Sweep Sine in an anechoic box at 40cm) at the device’s maximum volume.

How the score of the audio recording is composed

SBMARK engineers test recording by evaluating recorded files on reference audio equipment. These recordings are made in our laboratories and under real-life conditions, using apps and default settings.

While recording, our experts found the tone of the Oppo to be good overall. The tonal balance was fairly consistent across all use cases, and sounded natural, despite a lack of bottom-end clarity and an inconsistent upper midrange. This however allowed the background rendition to be quite unobtrusive and pleasant to listen to. Dynamic performance was good, with a decent signal-to-noise ratio in all use cases and a generally accurate envelope.

When recording video with the main camera in landscape orientation, our testers found audio amplitude and localizability of individual sound elements to be satisfactory, but not quite on par with the best in class. However, the results for both sub-attributes were excellent when recording selfie video in portrait orientation. Distance rendering was generally correct, but voices were often heard too far away. Volume performance was very good, thanks to relatively loud recordings and high resilience to high sound pressure levels, making the Find X6 Pro a good option for recording loud events, such as concerts.

Unwanted audio artifacts were very well under control, with only some compression and slight distortion at high SPLs. The Oppo Find X6 Pro proved to be quite efficient in windy conditions. His recordings preserved intelligibility as long as wind speeds were not too overwhelming. The audio zoom feature was also very efficient, but only for vocal content, as it had trouble isolating musical instruments when zoomed in.

Here’s how the Oppo Find X6 Pro fares in recording use cases compared to its competitors:

Use case scoring

The Timbre Score represents how well a phone captures sounds across the audible tonal range and takes into account bass, mids, treble, and tonal balance. It is the most important attribute for registration.

Video frequency response of life

A 1/12-octave frequency response graph, which measures the loudness of each frequency captured by your smartphone while recording a pure sine wave in an anechoic environment.

The Dynamics Score measures the accuracy of changes in the energy level of sound sources, such as how accurately plosives in a voice (p, t, k, for example) are reproduced. The score also considers the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), such as how loud the lead voice is compared to the background noise.

Secondary attributes for spatial testing include locating a specific sound’s location, positional balance, distance, and amplitude on recorded audio files.

Directness of registration

Smartphone directivity graph while recording test signals using the camera app, with the main camera. It represents the acoustic energy (in dB) on the angle of incidence of the sound source. (Normalized to 0° angle, in front of the device.)

The loudness score represents how loud audio is normalized on recorded files and how well the device handles loud environments, such as electronic concerts, while recording.

Here are the sound levels recorded in the audio and video files, measured in LUFS (Loudness Unit Full Scale); for reference, we expect volume levels to be above -24 LUFS for recorded content:

Encounter Videos life Selfie videos Memorandum
Oppo Find X6 Pro -25.7 LUFS -20.6 LUFS -18.7 LUFS -18.5 LUFS
Oppo Find X5 Pro -24.2 LUFS -20.4 LUFS -18.5 LUFS -18.6 LUFS
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Snapdragon) -26.5 LUFS -21.8 LUFS -22.4 LUFS -21.6 LUFS

The Artifacts score measures the extent to which recorded sounds are affected by various types of distortions. The higher the score, the less noticeable sound disturbances are. Distortions can occur due to in-device sound processing and microphone quality, as well as user handling, such as how the phone is held.

In this audio comparison, you can hear how this smartphone handles wind noise compared to its competitors:

matrix(3) {
[“Oppo Find X6 Pro”]=> string(70) “resources/Oppo/OppoFindX6ProV2.1/OppoFindX6Pro_MicrophoneArtifacts.m4a”
[“Oppo Find X5 Pro”]=> string(70) “resources/Oppo/OppoFindX6ProV2.1/OppoFindX5Pro_MicrophoneArtifacts.m4a”
[“Samsung Galaxy S23”]=> string(73) “resources/Oppo/OppoFindX6ProV2.1/SamsungGalaxyS23_MicrophoneArtifacts.m4a” }

Recordings of a voice sample with slight background noise, facing a 5 m/s turbulent wind

Background evaluates how smoothly various sounds around a voice blend into the video recording file. For example, when recording a speech at an event, the background shouldn’t interfere with the main vocal, but should provide context of your surroundings.

Let's talk about "Oppo Find X6 Pro Audio test" with our community!
Start a new Thread

Philip Owell

Professional blogger, here to bring you new and interesting content every time you visit our blog.