We subjected the Huawei P60 Pro to our rigorous SBMARK audio test suite to measure its performance both when recording sound using its built-in microphones, and when playing audio through its speakers.
In this review, we’ll analyze how it performed in a variety of tests and several common use cases.

Overview

Key audio specs include:

  • Two speakers (top left, bottom right)
  • No audio jack output
  • Huawei Histen technology

Reproduction

Pros

  • Good tonal balance
  • Good dynamic performance, precise attack and powerful punch

Against

  • Bass distortion
  • Compression at maximum volume
  • Fairly limited size

Registration

Pros

  • Good dynamic rendering, especially when recording concerts
  • Free of unwanted artifacts, such as distortion and compression
  • Good wind noise performance

Against

  • Soft stamp with the main camera app
  • Locability is a bit disappointing in home use cases.
  • The device is quite sensitive to finger noises and microphone occlusions.

The Huawei P60 Pro delivered solid performance in our SBMARK audio tests for both playback and recording. As a playback device, the Huawei performed best when listening to music, but it also performed well in our gaming and movie-watching use cases. Recording quality was better with the front-facing camera, with the results from the main camera and memo apps slightly lower.

The tonal balance in playback was satisfactory and the dynamic performance was very good in playback and recording. Recordings at high sound pressure levels, such as electronic music concerts, were generally free from distortion and excessive pumping. However, the P60 Pro also exhibited some glaring flaws that could have easily been fixed with better tuning, such as distorted bass during playback and inconsistent treble in recordings.

Trial summary

Learn about SBMARK audio tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone audio reviews, SBMARK engineers perform a series of objective tests and undertake more than 20 hours of perceptual evaluation under controlled laboratory conditions.
(For more details on our playback protocol, click here; for more details on our recording protocol, click here.)

The following section compiles the key elements of our extensive testing and analysis performed in the SBMARK laboratories. Detailed performance evaluations in the form of reports are available upon request. Do not hesitate to contact us.

How the audio playback score is composed

SBMARK engineers test playback through smartphone speakers, the performance of which is evaluated in our labs and under real-life conditions, using apps and preset settings.

As a playback device, the Huawei P60 Pro delivered a solid performance, with good tonal and dynamic performance. The tonal balance offered nice highs, natural mids, and good bass delivery. In terms of dynamic performance, our pundits observed snappy attack, decent bass accuracy, and a powerful punch. Projected soundstage width was only average for this class of device, and stereo balance didn’t appear to be perfectly uniform. On the plus side, the Huawei’s sound had good depth rendering, and individual sound sources in the scene could be located accurately and easily.

Volume at maximum volume was good, and the lowest volume setting was loud enough to hear soft volume passages in highly dynamic content, such as classical music. But measurements showed that the distribution of volume steps was inconsistent. Unwanted audio artifacts were overall well under control, but our experts noted some bass distortion at all volume levels, as well as some compression at maximum volume. Both effects were not too intrusive. Our testers found the right speaker to occlude easily when holding the device, but the impact on timbre and volume was negligible.

Hear about the playback performance of the smartphone tested in this comparison with some of its competitors:

Recordings of smartphones playing some of our songs at 60 LAeq in an anechoic environment via 2 microphones in AB configuration, at 30 cm

Here’s how the Huawei P60 Pro fares in playback use cases compared to its competitors:

Playback of use case scores

The Timbre score represents how well a phone reproduces sound across the audible tonal range and takes into account bass, mids, treble, tonal balance, and volume dependency. It is the most important attribute for reproduction.

Frequency response of music reproduction

A 1/12-octave frequency response graph, which measures the loudness of each frequency emitted by your smartphone as it reproduces a pure sine wave in an anechoic environment.

The Dynamics Score measures the accuracy of changes in the energy level of sound sources, such as how accurately a bass note or impact sound of drums is played.

Secondary attributes for spatial testing include pinpointing the location of a specific sound, its positional balance, distance, and amplitude.

The volume score represents the overall volume of a smartphone and how smoothly the volume increases and decreases based on user input.

Here are some sound pressure levels (SPL) measured while playing our sample recordings of hip-hop and classical music at maximum volume:

hip-hop Classic
Huawei P60Pro 71.9 dBA 69.4 dBA
Honor Magic5 Pro 69.5 dBA 66.4 dBA
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Snapdragon) 74.8 dBA 71.8 dBA

The following graph shows the gradual changes in volume from minimum to maximum. We expect these changes to be consistent across the range, so that all volume steps match user expectations:

Music volume consistency

This line graph shows the relative loudness of the playback versus the user selected volume step, measured at several volume steps with correlated pink noise in an anechoic box recorded 0.20 meter on axis.

The artifact score measures the extent to which the sound is affected by various types of distortion. The higher the score, the less noticeable sound disturbances are. Distortion can occur due to the sound processing in the device and the quality of the speakers.

Playback Total Harmonic Distortion (maximum volume)

This graph shows total harmonic distortion and noise over the audible frequency range.
It represents the distortion and noise of the device playing our test signal (0 dB Fs, Sweep Sine in an anechoic box at 40cm) at the device’s maximum volume.

How the score of the audio recording is composed

SBMARK engineers test recording by evaluating recorded files on reference audio equipment. These recordings are made in our laboratories and under real-life conditions, using apps and default settings.

While recording, our testers found tonal performance to be average, with a muffled tonal balance when using the main camera app. The highs were lackluster, the midrange was fine in all test use cases, and the bass benefited from good low-end extension but sounded overly boomy when recording loud concerts. Dynamic performance was good overall but not too consistent across use cases. The envelope was accurate and lifelike when recording loud concerts, but a severe lack of treble when recording with the main camera app meant plosives could sound quite weak. The signal-to-noise ratio was pretty good in all applications.

The Huawei did well in the spatial category, with a decent width of recorded soundstage and proper distance rendering. Locability of individual sound sources was fine overall, but when recording with the main and selfie cameras the position of voices in the scene tended to be fuzzy. The volume of the recordings was correct and unwanted audio was well under control, without distortion and compression, even at high sound pressure levels, such as you would encounter at electronic music concerts and similar events. The device was quite prone to finger noises and microphone occlusions. The background tonal balance was pleasant and unobtrusive in most use cases, but sounded heavily muffled in main camera recordings. Also, the background was free from artifacts.

Here’s how the Huawei P60 Pro fares in recording use cases compared to its competitors:

Use case scoring

The Timbre Score represents how well a phone captures sounds across the audible tonal range and takes into account bass, mids, treble, and tonal balance. It is the most important attribute for registration.

Video frequency response of life

A 1/12-octave frequency response graph, which measures the loudness of each frequency captured by your smartphone while recording a pure sine wave in an anechoic environment.

The Dynamics Score measures the accuracy of changes in the energy level of sound sources, such as how accurately plosives in a voice (p, t, k, for example) are reproduced. The score also considers the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), such as how loud the lead voice is compared to the background noise.

Secondary attributes for spatial testing include locating a specific sound’s location, positional balance, distance, and amplitude on recorded audio files.

Directness of registration

Smartphone directivity graph while recording test signals using the camera app, with the main camera. It represents the acoustic energy (in dB) on the angle of incidence of the sound source. (Normalized to 0° angle, in front of the device.)

The loudness score represents how loud audio is normalized on recorded files and how well the device handles noisy environments, such as electronic concerts, while recording.

Here are the sound levels recorded in the audio and video files, measured in LUFS (Loudness Unit Full Scale); for reference, we expect volume levels to be above -24 LUFS for recorded content:

Encounter Videos life Selfie videos Memorandum
Huawei P60Pro -24.5 LUFS -19.4 LUFS -18.9 LUFS -20.2 LUFS
Honor Magic5 Pro -23.9 LUFS -20.3 LUFS -19.4 LUFS -19.5 LUFS
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Snapdragon) -26.5 LUFS -21.8 LUFS -22.4 LUFS -21.6 LUFS

The Artifacts score measures the extent to which recorded sounds are affected by various types of distortions. The higher the score, the less noticeable sound disturbances are. Distortions can occur due to in-device sound processing and microphone quality, as well as user handling, such as how the phone is held.

In this audio comparison, you can hear how this smartphone handles wind noise compared to its competitors:

matrix(3) {
[“Huawei P60 Pro”]=> string(64) “resources/Huawei/P60ProV2.1/HuaweiP60Pro_MicrophoneArtifacts.m4a”
[“Honor Magic5 Pro”]=> string(66) “resources/Huawei/P60ProV2.1/HonorMagic5Pro_MicrophoneArtifacts.m4a”
[“Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra”]=> string(73) “resources/Huawei/P60ProV2.1/SamsungGalaxyS23Ultra_MicrophoneArtifacts.m4a” }

Recordings of a voice sample with slight background noise, facing a 5 m/s turbulent wind

Background evaluates how smoothly various sounds around a voice blend into the video recording file. For example, when recording a speech at an event, the background shouldn’t interfere with the main vocal, but should provide context of your surroundings.

Let's talk about "Huawei P60 Pro Audio test" with our community!
Start a new Thread

Philip Owell

Professional blogger, here to bring you new and interesting content every time you visit our blog.