We put the Apple iPhone 15 Pro through our rigorous SBMARK Camera test suite to measure its performance in photo, video and zoom quality from an end-user perspective. This article analyzes the behavior of the device in a series of tests and several common use cases and aims to highlight the most important results of our tests with an excerpt of the acquired data.

Overview

Key Camera Specifications:

  • Main: 48 MP sensor, 2.44 µm quad pixels, 24 mm equivalent f/1.78 aperture lens, Dual Pixel AF, OIS
  • Ultra wide angle: 12 MP sensor, 13 mm equivalent, f/2.2 aperture lens, Dual Pixel AF
  • Tele: 12 MP sensor, 1.0 µm pixels, 77 mm equivalent f/2.8 aperture lens
  • A17 Pro chipset

Pros

  • Vivid brightness and contrast when photos are viewed on the HDR display
  • Accurate exposure, even in night shots
  • Pleasant, natural color rendering and skin tones
  • Excellent detail in bright light
  • Fast and precise autofocus
  • Effective video stabilization

Against

  • Noise in low-light photos
  • Slightly limited dynamic range in photos
  • Unwanted artifacts, including glare, ghosting, and aliasing
  • Lack of detail in long-range tele shots

The Apple iPhone 15 Pro performed excellently in the SBMARK Camera tests, achieving the same score as the flagship iPhone 15 Pro Max and securing its position among the best in our ranking.

With identical Quad-Bayer image sensors in the main camera and chipset, both still image and video quality were very similar between the 15 Pro and the Pro Max. However, the two devices use different cameras, so it’s no surprise that the telezoom performance is an exception. The Pro Max uses a 5x periscope design, the Pro features a more conventional 3x camera. While performance was very similar at close-range telephoto, the Pro performed better at medium range and the Pro Max was best for long-range tele shots. Overall, the 15 Pro scored slightly lower in the zoom category than the 15 Pro Max. However, the small difference in zoom between the models had no effect on the overall score, which was identical for the two, due to the less weight than the zoom score in our camera scoring system. The scoring structure and formula of the Camera Protocol are presented in detail in an article that takes a closer look at how we test smartphone cameras.

Test summary

About SBMARK Camera Tests: SBMARK camera evaluations take place in laboratories and real-world situations using a wide variety of subjects. Scores are based on objective tests whose results are calculated directly by the measurement software in our laboratory setups, and on perceptual tests where a sophisticated set of metrics allows a panel of imaging experts to compare aspects of image quality images that require human judgment. Testing a smartphone involves a team of engineers and technicians for about a week. Photo, zoom and video quality are evaluated separately and then combined into an overall score for comparing cameras on different devices. For more information on the SBMARK camera protocol, click here. More details on smartphone camera scores can be found here. The following section compiles key elements of SBMARK’s comprehensive testing and analysis. Full performance evaluations are available upon request. Please contact us to find out how to receive a full report.

Apple iPhone 15 Pro camera scores compared to Ultra-Premium

This graph compares SBMARK photo, zoom, and video scores between the tested device and the references. The average and maximum scores of the price range are also indicated. The average and maximum scores for each price segment are calculated based on the SBMARK database of tested devices.

Photo

153

Huawei P60Pro

Huawei P60Pro

About SBMARK Camera Photo Tests

For scoring and analysis, SBMARK engineers capture and evaluate more than 2,600 test images in both controlled laboratory environments and natural outdoor, indoor, and low-light scenes, using the camera’s default settings. The photography protocol is designed to take into account key use cases and is based on typical shooting scenarios, such as portrait, family and landscape photography. Evaluation is performed by visually examining images Cons a natural scene reference and performing objective measurements on laboratory-captured graph images under varying lighting conditions from 1 to 1,000+ lux and color temperatures from 2,300K to 6,500K.

The iPhone 15 Pro’s performance in still image mode was on par with what we’d previously seen on the flagship 15 Pro Max, with the Smart HDR feature boosting color, contrast, and brightness for a very vivid overall image rendition. Additionally, our testers found that the levels of detail captured were very high, especially in portraits, where very fine details of facial features, such as skin texture and eyelashes, were very well preserved. Image noise was well under control overall, but our experts observed some luminance noise in the shadow areas of the frame. This was especially true in low-light conditions, where noise had a grainier appearance.

Apple iPhone 15 Pro vs Ultra-Premium Photo Scores

Photography tests analyze image quality attributes such as exposure, color, texture and noise under various lighting conditions. Autofocus performance and the presence of artifacts are also evaluated on all images captured under controlled laboratory conditions and in real-life images. All of these attributes have a significant impact on the final quality of images captured with the tested device and can help understand the camera’s key strengths and weaknesses.

Exposure

123

Improve

Highest score

Color

124

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max

Exposure and color are the key attributes for technically good images. For exposure, the main attribute evaluated is the brightness of the main subject across various use cases such as landscape, portrait or still life. Other factors evaluated are contrast and dynamic range, e.g. the ability to make details visible in both bright and dark areas of the image. Repeatability is also important because it demonstrates the camera’s ability to provide the same rendering when shooting multiple images of the same scene.
Regarding color, the image quality attributes analyzed are skin tone rendering, white balance, color shading and repeatability. Regarding color and skin tone rendering, we penalize unnatural colors but respect the manufacturer’s choice of color signature.

Apple iPhone 15 Pro – Accurate exposure, wide dynamic range, excellent detail, beautiful colors

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max – Accurate exposure, wide dynamic range, excellent detail, beautiful colors

Auto focus

105

Huawei P60Pro

Huawei P60Pro

Autofocus tests focus on focus accuracy, focus repeatability, shutter lag, and depth of field. Shutter delay is the difference between when the user presses the capture button and when the image is actually taken. It includes focusing speed and the device’s ability to capture images at the right time, the so-called “zero shutter lag” capability. While a shallow depth of field can be nice for single-subject portraits or close-ups, it can also pose a problem in some specific conditions such as group portraits; Both situations are tested. Focus accuracy is also evaluated in all real-world images taken, from infinity to close-up objects and low-light to outdoor conditions.

The iPhone 15 Pro largely retained the level of autofocus performance we’d already seen on its predecessor, including zero shutter lag in most shooting conditions. This means the camera can capture an image exactly at the moment the shutter is pressed, reducing the risk of missing the decisive moment.

Autofocus irregularity and speed: 1000Lux Δ2EV portable daylight

This graph illustrates focus accuracy and speed as well as zero shutter lag capability by showing edge sharpness versus shooting time measured with the AFHDR setup over a series of images. All photos were taken at 1000 Lux with daylight illuminant, 500 ms after blur. In this scenario, the backlit panels in the scene are set to simulate a fairly high dynamic range: the luminance ratio between the brightest point and an 18% reflective gray area is 2, which we denote by an exposure value difference of 2 Edge sharpness is measured on the four edges of the Dead Leaves graph and shooting time is measured on the LED universal timer.

Only in very difficult low-light conditions did our testers observe a slight delay to ensure good image quality overall.

Autofocus irregularity and speed: 5Lux Δ0EV Tungsten Handheld

This graph illustrates focus accuracy and speed as well as zero shutter lag capability by showing edge sharpness versus shooting time measured with the AFHDR setup over a series of images. All photos were taken at 5Lux with tungsten illuminant, 500 ms after blur. Edge sharpness is measured on the four edges of the Dead Leaves chart and shooting time is measured on the LED universal timer.

Structure

124

Improve

Highest score

Texture tests analyze the level of detail and texture of subjects in images taken in the lab and in real-life scenarios. For natural shots, special attention is paid to the level of detail in the light and dark areas of the image. Objective measurements are performed on map images taken under various lighting conditions from 1 to 1000 lux and different types of dynamic range conditions. The papers used are the proprietary SBMARK (DMC) paper and the Dead Leaves paper.

SBMARK CHART (DMC) Detail Retention Score vs. Lux Levels for Tripod and Handheld Conditions

This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail retention score with lux level, for two retention conditions. The DMC Detail Retention Score is derived from an AI-based metric trained to evaluate the performance of texture and detail on a selection of crops from our SBMARK chart.

Noise

ninety two

Honor Magic5 Pro

Honor Magic5 Pro

Noise tests analyze various noise attributes such as intensity, chromaticity, grain, texture on real-life images and on graph images taken in the laboratory. For natural images, particular attention is paid to noise on faces, landscapes, but also on dark areas and high dynamic range conditions. Noise on moving objects is also evaluated on natural images. Objective measurements are performed on graph images taken under various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux and different types of dynamic range conditions. The graph used is the dead leaf graph and standardized measurement such as visual noise derived from ISO 15739.

Evolution of visual noise with illuminance levels under handheld conditions

This graph shows the evolution of the visual noise metric with lux level in handheld conditions. The visual noise metric is the average of the visual noise measurement across all areas of the Dead Leaves graph in the AFHDR configuration. SBMARK visual noise measurement is derived from the ISO15739 standard.

Artifacts

76

XiaomiRedmi 12 5G

XiaomiRedmi 12 5G

Artifact evaluation examines lens shading, chromatic aberrations, geometric distortion, ringing edges, halos, ghosting, quantization, unexpected changes in color tone, among other types of possible unnatural effects on photo. The more severe and frequent the artifact, the greater the point deduction from the score. The main artifacts observed and the corresponding point loss are listed below.

Major penalties for photography artifacts

Bokeh

80

Improve

Highest score

Bokeh is tested in a dedicated mode, usually portrait or aperture mode, and analyzed by visually inspecting all images captured in the laboratory and in natural conditions. The goal is to reproduce a portrait photograph comparable to one taken with a DLSR and a wide aperture. The main image quality attributes that were paid attention to are depth estimation, artifacts, blur gradient, and the shape of the bokeh blur spotlights. The quality attributes of the portrait image (exposure, color, texture) are also taken into account.

Apple iPhone 15 Pro – Good subject isolation, but some fine details, such as the red threads around the head, are blurry.

Preview

85

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

Preview tests analyze the quality of the camera app’s image preview, with a focus on the difference between capture and preview, particularly regarding dynamic range and the application of bokeh. The smoothness of exposure, color and focus adaptation when switching from the minimum to the maximum available zoom factor is also evaluated. The preview frame rate is measured using the LED universal timer.

Apple iPhone 15 Pro – Preview – Similar render to capture, slightly more clipping of highlights

Apple iPhone 15 Pro – Capture – Accurate target exposure and neutral white balance

Zoom in

139

Huawei P60Pro

Huawei P60Pro

Learn about SBMARK camera zoom tests

SBMARK engineers capture and evaluate more than 400 test images in controlled laboratory environments and in natural outdoor, indoor, and low-light scenes, using default camera settings and pinch zoom at various zoom factors from ultra wide zoom to long range zoom. The evaluation is performed by visually examining the images Cons a reference of natural scenes and performing objective measurements of map images captured in the laboratory under different conditions from 20 to 1000 lux and color temperatures from 2300K to 6500K.

Instead of the Pro Max’s 5x periscope telephoto lens, the iPhone 15 Pro features a more conventional 3x variant. Despite the hardware differences, at close range both phones rely on the main camera for telezoom, and image quality was similar between the phones. However, at medium distances, the 15 Pro provides better detail, as the Pro Max telephoto lens only takes over with a 120mm equivalent focal length lens. Thanks to its 3x camera, the 15 Pro also provided a fairly consistent level of detail across the entire telephoto zoom range.

Apple iPhone 15 Pro vs Ultra-Premium Zoom Scores

This graph illustrates the relative scores for the different zoom ranges evaluated. The abscissa is expressed in focal length equivalent to 35 mm. Zoomed scores appear on the right and zoomed scores appear on the left.

Wide

103

Huawei P60Pro

Huawei P60Pro

These tests analyze the performance of the ultra-wide camera at different focal lengths from 12mm to 20mm. All image quality attributes are evaluated, with particular attention to artifacts such as chromatic aberrations, lens softness and distortion. The images below are an excerpt of the tested scenes.

Apple iPhone 15 Pro – Ultra-wide – Wide field of view, fairly high detail levels, similar to the 15 Pro Max.

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max – Ultra-wide – Wide field of view, fairly high levels of detail

Tele

103

Huawei P60Pro

Huawei P60Pro

All image quality attributes are evaluated at focal lengths between approximately 40mm and 300mm, with particular attention to texture and detail. The score is derived from a series of objective measurements in the laboratory and perceptual analysis of real-life images.

SBMARK CHART (DMC) detail retention score by focal length

This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail retention score versus the full-frame equivalent focal length for different lighting conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance, and the y-axis represents the maximum detail retention metric score – a higher value means better quality. The large dots correspond to the zoom ratio available in the camera application user interface.

SBMARK CHART (DMC) detail retention score by focal length

This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail retention score versus the full-frame equivalent focal length for different lighting conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance, and the y-axis represents the maximum detail retention metric score – a higher value means better quality. The large dots correspond to the zoom ratio available in the camera application user interface.

SBMARK CHART (DMC) detail retention score by focal length

This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail retention score versus the full-frame equivalent focal length for different lighting conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance, and the y-axis represents the maximum detail retention metric score – a higher value means better quality. The large dots correspond to the zoom ratio available in the camera application user interface.

SBMARK CHART (DMC) detail retention score by focal length

This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail retention score versus the full-frame equivalent focal length for different lighting conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance, and the y-axis represents the maximum detail retention metric score – a higher value means better quality. The large dots correspond to the zoom ratio available in the camera application user interface.

At close range, the telephoto performance of the iPhone 15 Pro and iPhone 15 Pro Max were similar.

Apple iPhone 15 Pro – Short-range telephoto lens

Apple iPhone 15 Pro – Good detail

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max – Short-range telephoto lens

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max – Good detail

At medium range, with a telephoto zoom factor around 3x, image results were better on the iPhone 15 Pro than on the Pro Max.

Apple iPhone 15 Pro – Medium Range Telephoto Lens (110mm)

Apple iPhone 15 Pro – Slight loss of detail

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max – Medium Range Telephoto (110mm)

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max – Lower level of detail, artifacts

video

158

Improve

Highest score

About SBMARK Camera Video Tests

SBMARK engineers capture and evaluate more than 2.5 hours of video in controlled laboratory environments and natural low-light scenes, indoors and outdoors, using default camera settings. The evaluation consists of visual inspection of natural videos taken under various conditions and performing objective measurements on videos of graphs recorded in the laboratory under different conditions from 1 to 1000+ lux and color temperatures from 2,300 K to 6,500 K.

Like the Pro Max, the iPhone 15 Pro was tested with 4K resolution, variable frame rate at 60 fps, and Dolby Vision enabled for embedded HDR data. This setup produced excellent results, similar to what we observed for the iPhone 15 Pro Max. Just as with any HDR video-enabled device, you need an HDR-compatible display to take advantage of the full potential of HDR rendering. Please note that YouTube only displays the original HDR rendering if videos are watched on an HDR-compatible display. Otherwise you will see a compressed SDR video.

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Video Scores vs. Ultra-Premium

Video tests analyze the same image quality attributes as still images, such as exposure, color, texture or noise, as well as temporal aspects such as speed, smoothness and stability of exposure, white balance and autofocus transitions.

Exposure

116

Improve

Highest score

Color

119

Improve

Highest score

Exposure tests evaluate the brightness of the main subject and the dynamic range, e.g. the ability to make details visible in both bright and dark areas of the image. The stability and temporal adaptation of the exposure are also analyzed.
Image quality color analysis examines color rendering, skin tone rendering, white balance, color shading, white balance stability and its adaptation when the light changes.

Apple iPhone 15 Pro – Accurate exposure, wide dynamic range, pleasant skin tones, stable autofocus

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max – Accurate exposure, wide dynamic range, pleasant skin tones, stable autofocus

Huawei P60 Pro – Accurate exposure, wide dynamic range, pleasant skin tones, stable autofocus

Structure

111

Oppo Find X6 Pro

Oppo Find X6 Pro

Texture tests analyze the level of detail and texture of real videos and graphics videos recorded in the lab. Natural video footage is assessed visually, paying particular attention to the level of detail in bright and dark areas. Objective measurements are performed on chart images taken under various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux. The cards used are SBMARK (DMC) card and Dead Leaves card.

SBMARK CHART (DMC) Video detail retention score versus lux levels

This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail retention video score with the lux level in the video. The DMC Detail Retention Score is derived from an AI-based metric trained to evaluate the performance of texture and detail on a selection of crops from our SBMARK chart.

Noise

119

Improve

Highest score

Noise tests analyze various noise attributes such as intensity, chromaticity, grain, structure, temporal aspects on real video recordings and on videos of graphs taken in the laboratory. Natural videos are evaluated visually, with particular attention to noise in dark areas and high dynamic range conditions. Objective measurements are performed on graph videos recorded under various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux. The graph used is the SBMARK visual noise graph.

Evolution of spatial visual noise with illuminance level

This graph shows the evolution of spatial visual noise with lux level. Spatial visual noise is measured on the visual noise graph in the video noise setup. SBMARK visual noise measurement is derived from the ISO15739 standard.

Temporal evolution of visual noise with illuminance level

This graph shows the evolution of temporal visual noise with lux level. Temporal visual noise is measured on the visual noise graph in the video noise setup.

Stabilization

118

Improve

Highest score

The stabilization rating checks the device’s ability to stabilize footage thanks to software or hardware technologies such as OIS, EIS or any other means. The evaluation examines residual motion, smoothness, yellow artifacts, and residual motion blur in walking and running use cases under various lighting conditions. The video below is an excerpt of one of the scenes tested.

Apple iPhone 15 Pro – Effective stabilization

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max – Effective stabilization

Huawei P60 Pro – Effective stabilization

Artifacts

85

Xiaomi 12S Ultra

Xiaomi 12S Ultra

Artifacts are evaluated with MTF and ringing measurements on the SFR graph in the lab, as well as frame rate measurements using the LED universal timer. Natural videos are visually evaluated paying particular attention to artifacts such as aliasing, quantization, blocking, and hue shift, among others. The more severe and frequent the artifact, the greater the deduction of points from the score. The main artifacts and the corresponding point loss are listed below.

Top penalties for video artifacts

Let's talk about "Apple iPhone 15 Pro Camera test" with our community!
Start a new Thread

Philip Owell

Professional blogger, here to bring you new and interesting content every time you visit our blog.