We put the Apple iPhone 15 through our rigorous SBMARK Camera test suite to measure its performance in photo, video and zoom quality from an end-user perspective. This article analyzes the behavior of the device in a series of tests and several common use cases and aims to highlight the most important results of our tests with an excerpt of the acquired data.

Please note that all iPhone 15 sample images in this review have been converted to JPG format. Image quality was analyzed using the original HEIC files. For both photos and videos, this article describes the best display pipeline for the best HDR experience.

Overview

Key Camera Specifications:

  • Main: 48 MP sensor, 26mm equivalent f/1.6 aperture lens, Dual Pixel PDAF, sensor-shift OIS
  • Ultra wide angle: 12 MP sensor, 13mm equivalent f/2.4 aperture lens
  • A16 bionic chipset

Pros

  • Vivid brightness and contrast when photos and videos are viewed on the HDR display
  • Pleasant, natural color rendering and skin tones, especially in bright light, for photos and videos
  • Accurate depth estimation and effective segmentation of fine details in portrait mode
  • Low noise levels in video mode
  • Effective video stabilization
  • Smooth zoom in preview

Against

  • Fairly high noise levels in the photo, especially in the shadows
  • Fairly limited zoom capabilities
  • Slightly limited dynamic range in photos and videos
  • Some loss of detail in videos in low light conditions
  • Artifacts, including glare, moving textures (in low light), and aliasing

Just like its sister models iPhone 15 Pro and 15 Pro Max, the iPhone 15 proved to be an extremely reliable camera in our tests, producing bright and vivid images when viewed on HDR screens. It particularly excels in terms of exposure and color, both in photo and video modes. This is the first time Apple has used a Quad-Bayer image sensor in non-Pro iPhone models, and as on last year’s iPhone 14 Pro and Pro Max models, on the iPhone 15 it has helped improve image quality and has seamless 2x telephoto zoom possible. . This resulted in a significant increase in the zoom score. However, the camera still lags behind the Pro models in terms of zoom performance, due to the lack of a dedicated tele module and a smaller maximum aperture on the ultra-wide module.

Test summary

About SBMARK Camera Tests: SBMARK camera evaluations take place in laboratories and real-world situations using a wide variety of subjects. Scores are based on objective tests whose results are calculated directly by the measurement software in our laboratory setups, and on perceptual tests where a sophisticated set of metrics allows a panel of imaging experts to compare aspects of image quality images that require human judgment. Testing a smartphone involves a team of engineers and technicians for about a week. Photo, zoom and video quality are evaluated separately and then combined into an overall score for comparing cameras on different devices. For more information on the SBMARK camera protocol, click here. More details on smartphone camera scores can be found here. The following section compiles key elements of SBMARK’s comprehensive testing and analysis. Full performance evaluations are available upon request. Please contact us to find out how to receive a full report.

Apple iPhone 15 camera scores

This graph compares SBMARK photo, zoom, and video scores between the tested device and the references. The average and maximum scores of the price range are also indicated. The average and maximum scores for each price segment are calculated based on the SBMARK database of tested devices.

Photo

147

Huawei P60Pro

Huawei P60Pro

About SBMARK Camera Photo Tests

For scoring and analysis, SBMARK engineers capture and evaluate more than 2,600 test images in both controlled laboratory environments and natural outdoor, indoor, and low-light scenes, using the camera’s default settings. The photography protocol is designed to take into account key use cases and is based on typical shooting scenarios, such as portrait, family and landscape photography. Evaluation is performed by visually examining images Cons a natural scene reference and performing objective measurements on laboratory-captured graph images under varying lighting conditions from 1 to 1,000+ lux and color temperatures from 2,300K to 6,500K.

At this year’s main event, Apple placed particular emphasis on portrait photography and a new feature called smart HDR, which appears to be a combination of an improved HDR algorithm at the capture level and a new file format that allows for specific rendering of images to HDR. view. We evaluated iPhone HEIC files with embedded HDR data using the Photos app on macOS Sonoma and an XDR display.

Other notable updates include moving the image size from 12MP to 24MP by default in most lighting conditions. In our testing, this resulted in a significantly improved texture/noise trade-off compared to the previous generation iPhone. Overall, in terms of still image quality, the iPhone 15 has made a major step forward, surpassing its predecessors in almost every photography test attribute.

Combining Apple’s HEIC image files with embedded HDR data produced stunning results when viewed on a dedicated display. Image results were stunning in both the Photos app on macOS Sonoma on an XDR display and the Photos app on the iPhone 15 display, rendering brighter and more vivid than ever. However, users of displays, devices, or apps that don’t support Apple’s HDR photo format will only see JPG images without the HDR effect.

Apple iPhone 15 photo scores

Photography tests analyze image quality attributes such as exposure, color, texture and noise under various lighting conditions. Autofocus performance and the presence of artifacts are also evaluated on all images captured under controlled laboratory conditions and in real-life images. All of these attributes have a significant impact on the final quality of images captured with the tested device and can help understand the camera’s key strengths and weaknesses.

Exposure

122

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

Color

122

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max

Exposure and color are the key attributes for technically good images. For exposure, the main attribute evaluated is the brightness of the main subject across various use cases such as landscape, portrait or still life. Other factors evaluated are contrast and dynamic range, e.g. the ability to make details visible in both bright and dark areas of the image. Repeatability is also important because it demonstrates the camera’s ability to provide the same rendering when shooting multiple images of the same scene.
Regarding color, the image quality attributes analyzed are skin tone rendering, white balance, color shading and repeatability. Regarding color and skin tone rendering, we penalize unnatural colors but respect the manufacturer’s choice of color signature.

Apple iPhone 15 – Vivid brightness and pleasant contrast on the HDR screen

Apple iPhone 14 – Pretty wide dynamic range

Samsung Galaxy S23 – Bright and pleasant colors

Auto focus

100

Huawei P60Pro

Huawei P60Pro

Autofocus tests focus on focus accuracy, focus repeatability, shutter lag, and depth of field. Shutter delay is the difference between when the user presses the capture button and when the image is actually taken. It includes focusing speed and the device’s ability to capture images at the right time, the so-called “zero shutter lag” capability. While a shallow depth of field can be nice for single-subject portraits or close-ups, it can also pose a problem in some specific conditions such as group portraits; Both situations are tested. Focus accuracy is also evaluated in all real-world images taken, from infinity to close-up objects and low-light to outdoor conditions.

Autofocus irregularity and speed: 1000Lux Δ0EV portable daylight

This graph illustrates focus accuracy and speed as well as zero shutter lag capability by showing edge sharpness versus shooting time measured with the AFHDR setup over a series of images. All photos were taken at 1000 Lux with daylight illuminant, 500 ms after blur. Edge sharpness is measured on the four edges of the Dead Leaves chart and shooting time is measured on the LED universal timer.

Structure

113

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

Texture tests analyze the level of detail and texture of subjects in images taken in the lab and in real-life scenarios. For natural shots, special attention is paid to the level of detail in the light and dark areas of the image. Objective measurements are performed on map images taken under various lighting conditions from 1 to 1000 lux and different types of dynamic range conditions. The papers used are the proprietary SBMARK (DMC) paper and the Dead Leaves paper.

SBMARK CHART (DMC) Detail Retention Score vs. Lux Levels for Tripod and Handheld Conditions

This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail retention score with lux level, for two retention conditions. The DMC Detail Retention Score is derived from an AI-based metric trained to evaluate the performance of texture and detail on a selection of crops from our SBMARK chart.

Noise

97

Honor Magic5 Pro

Honor Magic5 Pro

Noise tests analyze various noise attributes such as intensity, chromaticity, grain, texture on real-life images and on graph images taken in the laboratory. For natural images, particular attention is paid to noise on faces, landscapes, but also on dark areas and high dynamic range conditions. Noise on moving objects is also evaluated on natural images. Objective measurements are performed on graph images taken under various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux and different types of dynamic range conditions. The graph used is the dead leaf graph and standardized measurement such as visual noise derived from ISO 15739.

Evolution of visual noise with illuminance levels under handheld conditions

This graph shows the evolution of the visual noise metric with lux level in handheld conditions. The visual noise metric is the average of the visual noise measurement across all areas of the Dead Leaves graph in the AFHDR configuration. SBMARK visual noise measurement is derived from the ISO15739 standard.

Artifacts

75

XiaomiRedmi 12 5G

XiaomiRedmi 12 5G

Artifact evaluation examines lens shading, chromatic aberrations, geometric distortion, ringing edges, halos, ghosting, quantization, unexpected color tone changes, among other types of possible unnatural effects on the photos. The more severe and frequent the artifact, the greater the point deduction from the score. The main artifacts observed and the corresponding point loss are listed below.

Major penalties for photography artifacts

Bokeh

80

Improve

Highest score

Bokeh is tested in a dedicated mode, usually portrait or aperture mode, and analyzed by visually inspecting all images captured in the laboratory and in natural conditions. The goal is to reproduce a portrait photograph comparable to one taken with a DLSR and a wide aperture. The main image quality attributes that were paid attention to are depth estimation, artifacts, blur gradient, and the shape of the bokeh blur spotlights. The quality attributes of the portrait image (exposure, color, texture) are also taken into account.

Apple iPhone 15 – Very good portrait mode with accurate skin tones

Preview

84

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

Preview tests analyze the quality of the camera app’s image preview, with a focus on the difference between capture and preview, particularly regarding dynamic range and the application of bokeh. The smoothness of exposure, color and focus adaptation when switching from the minimum to the maximum available zoom factor is also evaluated. The preview frame rate is measured using the LED universal timer.

Apple iPhone 15 – Preview – quite similar to the acquisition

Apple iPhone 15 – Capture: What you get is close to what you see

Zoom in

114

Huawei P60Pro

Huawei P60Pro

Learn about SBMARK camera zoom tests

SBMARK engineers capture and evaluate more than 400 test images in controlled laboratory environments and in natural outdoor, indoor, and low-light scenes, using default camera settings and pinch zoom at various zoom factors from ultra wide zoom to long range zoom. The evaluation is performed by visually examining the images Cons a reference of natural scenes and performing objective measurements of map images captured in the laboratory under different conditions from 20 to 1000 lux and color temperatures from 2300K to 6500K.

The Apple iPhone 15 comes with an ultra-wide camera module, but not a dedicated camera. Meanwhile, the 48MP Quad Bayer primary camera offers similar optical zoom capabilities up to a 2x telephoto zoom factor (equivalent to a 52mm lens). Using digital methods a telephoto zoom factor of up to 10x is achieved.

Apple iPhone 15 Zoom Scores

This graph illustrates the relative scores for the different zoom ranges evaluated. The abscissa is expressed in focal length equivalent to 35 mm. Zoomed scores appear on the right and zoomed scores appear on the left.

Wide

90

Huawei P60Pro

Huawei P60Pro

These tests analyze the performance of the ultra-wide camera at different focal lengths from 12mm to 20mm. All image quality attributes are evaluated, with particular attention to artifacts such as chromatic aberrations, lens softness and distortion. The images below are an excerpt of the tested scenes.

Apple iPhone 15 – Good exposure, wide dynamic range, slight warm color cast, vivid colors, slight loss of detail, slight flare

Apple iPhone 14 – Good exposure, slight highlight clipping, vivid colors, slight loss of detail, flare

Google Pixel 7 – Good exposure, wide dynamic range, slight warm color cast, vivid colors, slight loss of detail, flare

Tele

84

Huawei P60Pro

Huawei P60Pro

All image quality attributes are evaluated at focal lengths between approximately 40mm and 300mm, with particular attention to texture and detail. The score is derived from a series of objective measurements in the laboratory and perceptual analysis of real-life images.

SBMARK CHART (DMC) detail retention score by focal length

This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail retention score versus the full-frame equivalent focal length for different lighting conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance, and the y-axis represents the maximum detail retention metric score – a higher value means better quality. The large dots correspond to the zoom ratio available in the camera application user interface.

SBMARK CHART (DMC) detail retention score by focal length

This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail retention score versus the full-frame equivalent focal length for different lighting conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance, and the y-axis represents the maximum detail retention metric score – a higher value means better quality. The large dots correspond to the zoom ratio available in the camera application user interface.

SBMARK CHART (DMC) detail retention score by focal length

This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail retention score versus the full-frame equivalent focal length for different lighting conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance, and the y-axis represents the maximum detail retention metric score – a higher value means better quality. The large dots correspond to the zoom ratio available in the camera application user interface.

SBMARK CHART (DMC) detail retention score by focal length

This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail retention score versus the full-frame equivalent focal length for different lighting conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance, and the y-axis represents the maximum detail retention metric score – a higher value means better quality. The large dots correspond to the zoom ratio available in the camera application user interface.

video

153

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

About SBMARK Camera Video Tests

SBMARK engineers capture and evaluate more than 2.5 hours of video in controlled laboratory environments and natural low-light scenes, indoors and outdoors, using default camera settings. The evaluation consists of visual inspection of natural videos taken under various conditions and performing objective measurements on videos of graphs recorded in the laboratory under different conditions from 1 to 1000+ lux and color temperatures from 2,300 K to 6,500 K.

Just like the iPhone 15 and other HDR video-enabled devices we’ve tested previously, you need an HDR-compatible display to take advantage of the full potential of HDR rendering. Please note that YouTube only displays the original HDR rendering if videos are watched on an HDR-compatible display. Otherwise you will see a compressed SDR video.

We tested the Apple iPhone 15’s video mode with 4K resolution, a variable frame rate of 60 fps, and Dolby Vision enabled for embedded HDR data. This setup produced exceptional video results, surpassing the performance of Apple’s previous flagship models. Video exposure and color rendition remained remarkably consistent across a wide range of recording conditions, and noise levels were better managed than previous generations of devices. Autofocus performance was excellent, even in low light, and video stabilization was among the best currently available on the market.

Apple iPhone 15 Video Scores

Video tests analyze the same image quality attributes as still images, such as exposure, color, texture or noise, as well as temporal aspects such as speed, smoothness and stability of exposure, white balance and autofocus transitions.

Exposure

115

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

The iPhone 15 shares the top score for video exposure with the iPhone 15 Pro, thanks to the superbly handled HDR format, which provided a very wide dynamic range, exceptionally stable exposure and smooth exposure transitions, even in low-light scenes.

Color

117

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

The iPhone 15 outperformed most of its competitors in terms of color. White balance tended to produce slightly warm results indoors and in low-light conditions, but skin tones were rendered accurately and overall color rendition was quite pleasing. Our testers also observed some white balance fluctuations, but they were very rare.

Exposure tests evaluate the brightness of the main subject and the dynamic range, e.g. the ability to make details visible in both bright and dark areas of the image. The stability and temporal adaptation of the exposure are also analyzed.
Image quality color analysis examines color rendering, skin tone rendering, white balance, color shading, white balance stability and its adaptation when the light changes.

Apple iPhone 15 – Good exposure, slight highlight clipping, slight warm cast, slight noise

Apple iPhone 14 – Good exposure, slight highlight clipping, slight warm cast, noise

Google Pixel 7 – Good exposure, slight highlight clipping, slight warm cast, noise, slight autofocus instability

Structure

107

Oppo Find X6 Pro

Oppo Find X6 Pro

Since the iPhone 15 was tested at a higher frame rate than usual (60 fps), texture results were slightly lower than the competition. Sometimes you notice a slight loss of detail, especially when recording indoors or in low light conditions.

Texture tests analyze the level of detail and texture of real videos and graphics videos recorded in the lab. Natural video footage is assessed visually, paying particular attention to the level of detail in bright and dark areas. Objective measurements are performed on chart images taken under various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux. The cards used are SBMARK (DMC) card and Dead Leaves card.

SBMARK CHART (DMC) Video detail retention score versus lux levels

This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail retention video score with the lux level in the video. The DMC Detail Retention Score is derived from an AI-based metric trained to evaluate the performance of texture and detail on a selection of crops from our SBMARK chart.

Noise

117

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

Video noise has been improved over the Apple 14 series, with significant improvements in lower light conditions. Well-controlled video noise with an HDR video format is one of the biggest strengths of the iPhone 15’s video mode.

Noise tests analyze various noise attributes such as intensity, chromaticity, grain, structure, temporal aspects on real video recordings and on videos of graphs taken in the laboratory. Natural videos are evaluated visually, with particular attention to noise in dark areas and high dynamic range conditions. Objective measurements are performed on graph videos recorded under various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux. The graph used is the SBMARK visual noise graph.

Evolution of spatial visual noise with illuminance level

This graph shows the evolution of spatial visual noise with lux level. Spatial visual noise is measured on the visual noise graph in the video noise setup. SBMARK visual noise measurement is derived from the ISO15739 standard.

Temporal evolution of visual noise with illuminance level

This graph shows the evolution of temporal visual noise with lux level. Temporal visual noise is measured on the visual noise graph in the video noise setup.

Stabilization

117

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

In terms of video stabilization, our testers found the iPhone 15 to be on par with most current flagship devices equipped with a stabilized main camera module. Camera shake was effectively counteracted but still slightly noticeable. Frame sharpness was more consistent than that of the iPhone 14 Pro.

The stabilization rating checks the device’s ability to stabilize footage thanks to software or hardware technologies such as OIS, EIS or any other means. The evaluation examines residual motion, smoothness, yellow artifacts, and residual motion blur in walking and running use cases under various lighting conditions. The video below is an excerpt of one of the scenes tested.

Apple iPhone 15 – Good exposure, slight highlight clipping, camera shake, slight white balance and exposure instability while running

Apple iPhone 14 – Good exposure, slight highlight clipping, slight white balance instability, slight camera shake and sharpness differences between frames, slight white balance and exposure instability while running

Google Pixel 7 – Good exposure, slight highlight clipping, slight white balance instability, slight camera shake and sharpness differences between frames, slight white balance and exposure instability while running

Artifacts

84

Xiaomi 12S Ultra

Xiaomi 12S Ultra

Artifacts are evaluated with MTF and ringing measurements on the SFR graph in the lab, as well as frame rate measurements using the LED universal timer. Natural videos are visually evaluated paying particular attention to artifacts such as aliasing, quantization, blocking, and hue shifting, among others. The more severe and frequent the artifact, the greater the deduction of points from the score. The main artifacts and the corresponding point loss are listed below.

Top penalties for video artifacts

The iPhone 15’s high 60fps frame rate helped minimize unwanted artifacts, particularly the judder effect that tends to affect panoramic shots. However, typical minor artefacts such as aliasing, flare and moving textures may occasionally be observed in low light conditions. While these artifacts had very little impact on overall video quality, flare effects could pose a greater challenge to videographers.

Let's talk about "Apple iPhone 15 Camera test" with our community!
Start a new Thread

Philip Owell

Professional blogger, here to bring you new and interesting content every time you visit our blog.