We subjected the Sony Xperia 5 IV to our rigorous SBMARK Battery test suite to measure its performance in terms of battery life, charging and efficiency. In these test results, we’ll analyze how it performed in a variety of tests and several common use cases.
Overview
Key Specifications:
- Battery Capacity: 5000mAh
- 30W charger (not included)
- 6.1 inch OLED display, 1080 x 2520, 120Hz
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4nm)
- ROM / RAM combination tested: 128GB + 8GB
Pros
- Fair autonomy, with more than 2 days of moderate use
- Excellent autonomy on the move, especially when calling
- Excellent autonomy when testing each use separately (video, music, calls, games)
- Excellent power adapter efficiency
- Very low residual battery charger consumption
- Low overall discharge currents
Versus
- Inaccurate battery gauge
- Below average battery life at idle
- Slow reload speed
- Low autonomy recovered after a 5-minute recharge
- Poor charging efficiency
The battery performance of the Sony Xperia 5 IV is between the Xperia 1 IV and the Xperia 10 IV. Its overall score nearly caught up with the average in our database, significantly outperforming the Xperia 1 IV in almost all use cases, but lagging far behind the Xperia 10 IV and its outstanding battery life.
Compared to devices in the same ultra-premium price range ($800+), the Xperia 5 IV earned a decent overall score mainly due to its excellent battery life and efficiency, but its charging performance was among the lowest. The 30W charger struggled to fill the large 5000mAh battery. However, its efficiency was excellent and its residual consumption, among the lowest in our database, was well managed.
When testing each use separately, the Sony Xperia 5 IV’s battery life was always above average, and its performance on the go was the same, especially during calls. The discharge currents were low on average, showing that the device was well managed.
Trial summary
Learn about SBMARK battery tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone battery reviews, SBMARK engineers conduct a series of objective tests over a one-week period both indoors and outdoors. (See our introduction and how we test articles for more details on our smartphone’s battery protocol.)
The following section compiles the key elements of our extensive testing and analysis performed in the SBMARK laboratories. Detailed performance evaluations in the form of reports are available upon request. Do not hesitate to contact us.
| Battery | Battery charger | wireless | Screen | Processor | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sony Xperia 5 IV | 5000mAh | 30W (not included) |
15W | OLEDs 1080×2520 |
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 |
| Sony Xperia 1 IV | 5000mAh | 30W (not included) |
15W | OLEDs 1644×3840 |
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 |
| Apple iPhone 14 Pro | 3200mAh | 20W (not included) |
15W | OLEDs 1179 x 2556 |
Apple A16 bionic |
| Google Pixel 7 Pro | 5000mAh | 30W (not included) |
23W | OLEDs 1440×3120 |
Google Tensor G2 |
Autonomy
120
Wiko Power U30
Wiko Power U30
How the Autonomy score is composed
The Battery Life Score is composed of three performance sub-scores: Home/Office, On the Go, and Calibrated Use Cases. Each subscore includes results from a full range of tests to measure range in all kinds of real-life scenarios.
80 hours
Light use
Active: 2h30/day
57 hours
Moderate use
Active: 4h/day
36 hours
Intensive use
Active: 7h/day
Home office
107
Vivo Y72 5G
Vivo Y72 5G
A robot housed in a Faraday cage performs a series of touch-based user actions during what we call our “typical usage scenario” (TUS) — making calls, streaming video, etc. — 4 hours of active use over the course of a 16 hour period, plus 8 hours of “sleep”. The robot repeats this series of actions every day until the device runs out.
In movement
139
Samsung Galaxy M51
Samsung Galaxy M51
Using a smartphone on the go has a negative impact on range due to additional “hidden” demands, such as continuous signaling associated with cellular network selection. SBMARK Battery experts take the phone outdoors and perform a series of precisely defined activities following the same three-hour travel itinerary (walking, taking the bus, the subway…) for each device
Calibrated
136
Samsung Galaxy M51
Samsung Galaxy M51
For this series of tests, the smartphone returns to the Faraday cage and to ours bots repeatedly perform actions related to a specific use case (like gaming, video streaming, etc.) at a time. Starting with an 80% charge, all devices are tested until they have used at least 5% battery power.
Reload
100
Realme GTNeo 3
Realme GTNeo 3
How the recharge score is composed
Charging is fully part of the overall battery experience. In some situations where range is at its lowest, knowing how fast you can charge becomes a concern. The SBMARK Battery Charging Score consists of two subscores, (1) Full Charge and (2) Fast Boost.
Charge complete
94
Black Shark 5Pro
Black Shark 5Pro
The full charge tests evaluate the reliability of the battery charge indicator; measure how long and how much energy it takes for the battery to charge from zero to 80% capacity, from 80 to 100% as shown by the user interface, and to an actual full charge.
The charging curves, in wired and wireless mode (if available) showing the evolution of the battery level indicator as well as the energy consumption in watts during the charging phases towards full capacity.
The time to full charge graph breaks down the time required to reach 80%, 100% and full charge.
Quick push
107
Realme GTNeo 3
Realme GTNeo 3
With the phone at different charge levels (20%, 40%, 60%, 80%), the Quick Boost tests measure how much charge the battery receives after being plugged in for 5 minutes. The graph here compares the average range gain with a 5-minute quick charge.
Efficiency
120
Oppo Reno6 5G
Oppo Reno6 5G
How the efficiency score is composed
The SBMARK Energy Efficiency Score consists of two subscores, charge rate and discharge rate, which combine both data obtained during a typical robot-based usage scenario, calibrated testing and charge rating, taking into consideration battery capacity of the device. SBMARK calculates the product’s annual energy consumption, shown in the graph below, which is representative of overall efficiency during a charge and when in use.
To load
110
Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro
Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro
The secondary charge score is a combination of four factors: the overall efficiency of a full charge, relating to the amount of energy required to recharge the battery compared to the energy the battery can supply; the efficiency of the travel adapter when it comes to transferring power from an outlet to your phone; the remaining consumption when the phone is fully charged and still connected to the charger; and the residual consumption of the charger itself, when the smartphone is disconnected from it. The graph below shows the overall efficiency of a full charge in %.
Discharge
126
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
The sub-discharge score evaluates how quickly a battery discharges during a test, which is independent of battery capacity. It is the ratio between the capacity of a battery and its autonomy. A small capacity battery may have the same run time as a large capacity battery, indicating that the device is well optimized, with a low discharge rate.
Start a new Thread