We subjected the Xiaomi 12T to our rigorous SBMARK camera test suite to measure its performance in terms of photo, video and zoom quality from an end-user perspective. This article explains how the device performed in a variety of tests and different common use cases and aims to highlight the most important results of our tests with an extract of the acquired data.

Overview

Key Camera Specifications:

  • Main: 108MP 1/67 inch sensor, 0.64μm pixel, f / 1.7 aperture lens, AF, OIS
  • Ultra-wide: 8MP sensor, 120 ° field of view, f / 2.2 aperture lens
  • Macro: 2MP sensor, f / 2.4 aperture lens

Pros

  • Fairly good details in most test conditions
  • Generally well controlled noise in indoor and outdoor conditions
  • Relatively fast and repeatable autofocus
  • Quite accurate depth estimation in bokeh mode

versus

  • Very limited dynamic range in high contrast scenes
  • Occasional skin tone inaccuracies and frequent color casts in low light conditions
  • Rendering unnatural details on faces
  • Reflection and low contrast in flash shots
  • Ultra-wide and tele: limited dynamic range and low texture-noise compromise

With a SBMARK Camera score of 115, the Xiaomi 12T doesn’t come close to the top devices in our Premium segment ranking, but compared to last year’s 11T model, it shows significant improvements in many areas. For example, the 12T features a much better texture / noise tradeoff than its predecessor and many competitors in its class. Details are particularly good in low-light conditions in terms of texture, although image noise is noticeable in such conditions as well. We also loved the 12T’s preview image on the display, which came close enough to final capture, except in low-light, high-contrast scenes. The downside is that the dynamic range is very limited, resulting in frequent highlights and shadows in difficult, high-contrast scenes. Our testers also observed an unnatural rendering of skin tone, both in terms of texture and reddish cast.

In video mode, the Xiaomi performs quite well in low light conditions, with good target exposure and accurate color rendering. Fine details are rendered very well in all lighting conditions, but some noise tends to be noticeable, especially on moving elements in low light. In bright outdoor light conditions, the camera tends to overexpose, which results in inaccurate colors. To make matters worse, the white balance is unstable. As with the photo, the dynamic range is limited. However, highlight clipping is less pronounced than some rivals in its class. The video autofocus performs very well overall. It is stable, with quick reactions and smooth transitions.

Test summary

About SBMARK Camera Tests: SBMARK camera assessments take place in labs and real-world situations using a wide variety of subjects. Scores are based on objective tests for which results are calculated directly by the measurement software on our laboratory settings and on perceptual tests in which a sophisticated set of metrics allows a group of image experts to compare aspects of quality image that require human judgment. Testing a smartphone involves a team of engineers and technicians for about a week. The quality of photo, zoom and video is evaluated separately and then combined into an overall score for comparing cameras from different devices. For more information on the SBMARK Camera protocol, click here. More details on the smartphone camera scores can be found here. The following section collects the key elements of SBMARK’s comprehensive testing and analysis. Comprehensive performance evaluations are available upon request. Contact us to find out how to receive a full report.

Xiaomi 12T camera scores

This chart compares the SBMARK photo, zoom and video scores between the tested device and the references. The average and maximum scores of the price segment are also indicated. The average and maximum scores for each price segment are calculated based on the SBMARK database of tested devices.

Photo

120

Honor Magic4 Ultimate

Honor Magic4 Ultimate

About SBMARK Camera Photo Tests

For scoring and analysis, SBMARK engineers capture and evaluate more than 2,600 test images in both controlled laboratory environments and natural outdoor, indoor and low-light scenes, using the camera’s default settings. The photographic protocol is designed to take into account the main use cases and is based on typical shooting scenarios, such as portraits, family photographs and landscapes. Evaluation is done by visually inspecting images Cons a natural scene reference and making objective measurements on graphical images captured in the lab under various lighting conditions from 1 to 1,000+ lux and color temperatures from 2,300K to 6,500K.

Xiaomi 12T Photo scores

Photo tests analyze image quality attributes such as exposure, color, texture, and noise under various lighting conditions. Autofocus performance and the presence of artifacts on all images acquired under controlled laboratory conditions and in real-life images are also evaluated. All of these attributes have a significant impact on the final quality of the images captured with the tested device and can help in understanding the main strengths and weaknesses of the camera.

Exposure

90

Honor Magic4 Ultimate

Honor Magic4 Ultimate

Color

81

Google Pixel 7 Pro

Google Pixel 7 Pro

Exposure and color are the key attributes for technically good images. For exposure, the main attribute evaluated is the brightness of the main subject in various use cases such as landscape, portrait or still life. Other factors evaluated are contrast and dynamic range, eg. the ability to make details visible in both light and dark areas of the image. Repeatability is also important because it demonstrates the camera’s ability to deliver the same rendering when shooting multiple images of the same scene.
For color, the analyzed image quality attributes are skin tone rendering, white balance, color shading, and repeatability. For the rendering of color and skin tone, we penalize unnatural colors but respect the manufacturer’s choice of the chromatic signature.

Xiaomi 12T – good level of detail, well controlled noise, too orange skin tones

Xiaomi 11T – Good level of detail but slightly unnatural textures, slight noise, acceptable colors

Samsung Galaxy A22 5G – slightly limited level of detail, slight noise, washed-out colors

Autofocus

89

Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max

Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max

Autofocus tests focus on focus accuracy, focus repeatability, shutter lag and depth of field. The shutter lag is the difference between the time the user presses the capture button and the time the image is actually taken. It includes focus speed and the ability of the device to capture images at the right moment, what is called “zero shutter lag” capability. While shallow depth of field can be nice for a single-subject portrait or close-up, it can also be a problem in some specific conditions such as group portraits; Both situations are tested. Focus accuracy is also evaluated in all real-life images taken, from infinity to close-up objects and in low light to outdoor conditions.

Autofocus irregularity and speed: 1000Lux Δ0EV Daylight Handheld

This graph illustrates focus accuracy and speed as well as zero shutter lag capability, showing edge sharpness versus shutter speed measured on the AFHDR setting over a series of images. All photos were taken at 1000 Lux with the Daylight Highlighter, 500ms after blurring. Edge sharpness is measured on the four edges of the Dead Leaves graph and shutter speed is measured on the Universal Timer LED.

Structure

94

Oppo Find X5

Oppo Find X5

Texture tests analyze the level of detail and texture of subjects in images taken in the laboratory as well as in real-life scenarios. For natural shots, special attention is paid to the level of detail in the light and dark areas of the image. Objective measurements are performed on map images taken under various lighting conditions from 1 to 1000 lux and different types of dynamic range conditions. The charts used are the proprietary SBMARK (DMC) chart and the Dead Leaves chart.

SBMARK CHART (DMC) detail retention score versus lux levels for tripod and handheld conditions

This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail retention score with the lux level, for two retention conditions. The DMC detail retention score is derived from an AI-based metric trained to evaluate texture and detail rendering on a selection of crops from our SBMARK chart.

Noise

101

Honor Magic4 Ultimate

Honor Magic4 Ultimate

Noise tests analyze various attributes of noise such as intensity, chromaticity, grain, texture on real-life images and graphical images taken in the laboratory. For natural images, special attention is paid to noise on faces, landscapes, but also on dark areas and high dynamic range conditions. Noise on moving objects is also evaluated on natural images. Objective measurements are performed on graphical images taken under various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux and different types of dynamic range conditions. The graph used is the Dead Leaves graph and standardized measurement such as visual noise derived from ISO 15739.

Evolution of visual noise with lighting levels in handheld condition

This graph shows the evolution of the visual noise metric with the lux level under portable conditions. The visual noise metric is the average of the visual noise measurement across all Dead Leaves chart patches in the AFHDR setting. SBMARK visual noise measurement is derived from the ISO15739 standard.

Manufactured goods

75

Google Pixel 6

Google Pixel 6

Artifact evaluation examines lens shading, chromatic aberrations, geometric distortion, edge ring, halos, ghosting, quantization, unexpected variations in color tone, among other types of possible unnatural effects on photos. The more severe and frequent the artifact, the greater the point deduction from the score. The main artifacts observed and the corresponding point loss are listed below.

Main penalties for photographic artifacts

Preview

120

Honor Magic4 Ultimate

Honor Magic4 Ultimate

The preview tests analyze the image quality of the camera app image preview, with particular attention to the difference between capture and preview, especially with regards to dynamic range and application of the bokeh effect. The smoothness of exposure, color and focus adaptation are also evaluated when zooming from the minimum to the maximum available zoom factor. The preview frame rate is measured using the Universal Timer LED.

Xiaomi 12T, preview: highlight clipping stronger than capture, similar exposure

Enlarge

67

Honor Magic4 Ultimate

Honor Magic4 Ultimate

Learn about SBMARK camera zoom tests

SBMARK engineers capture and evaluate over 400 test images in controlled laboratory environments and outdoor, indoor and natural scenes in low light conditions, using the camera’s default settings and zooming in at various zoom factors, from ultra wide angle to ultra-long range zoom. Evaluation is done by visually inspecting images Cons a natural scene reference and making objective measurements of graphs captured in the lab under different conditions from 20 to 1000 lux and color temperatures from 2300K to 6500K.

Xiaomi 12T zoom scores

This graph illustrates the relative scores for the different zoom ranges evaluated. The abscissa is expressed in a focal length equivalent to 35 mm. The zoom-in scores are displayed on the right and the zoom-out scores on the left.

Wide

85

Honor Magic4 Ultimate

Honor Magic4 Ultimate

These tests analyze the performance of the ultra-wide-angle camera at different focal lengths from 12mm to 20mm. All image quality attributes are evaluated, with particular attention to artifacts such as chromatic aberrations, lens softness and distortion. The images below are an excerpt of tested scenes.

Xiaomi 12T: precise target exposure, limited dynamic range, loss of detail, noise

Xiaomi 11T – slight underexposure, loss of detail, noise

Samsung Galaxy A22 5G: precise target exposure, limited dynamic range, loss of detail, noise

Tele

33

Honor Magic4 Ultimate

Honor Magic4 Ultimate

All image quality attributes are evaluated at focal lengths from about 40mm to 300mm, with a focus on texture and detail. The score is derived from a series of objective measurements in the laboratory and from the perceptual analysis of real-life images.

Xiaomi 12T – Low level of detail, visible noise, strong light clipping

Xiaomi 12T – Low level of detail, visible noise, strong light clipping

Xiaomi 11T – Low level of detail, loud noise, low target exposure

Xiaomi 11T – Low level of detail, loud noise, low target exposure

Samsung Galaxy A22 5G – Details are lost, visible noise, bright clipping

Samsung Galaxy A22 5G – Details are lost, visible noise, bright clipping

video

127

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

About SBMARK Camera Video Tests

SBMARK engineers capture and evaluate over 2.5 hours of video in controlled laboratory environments and natural low-light scenes, indoor and outdoor, using the camera’s default settings. The assessment consists of visually inspecting natural videos taken under various conditions and carrying out objective measurements on graphical videos recorded in the laboratory under different conditions from 1 to 1000+ lux and color temperatures from 2,300 K to 6,500 K.

Xiaomi 12T video scores

Video tests analyze the same image quality attributes as still images, such as exposure, color, texture, or noise, as well as temporal aspects such as speed, exposure uniformity and stability, white balance, and autofocus transitions.

Exposure

95

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

Color

94

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

Exposure tests evaluate the brightness of the main subject and the dynamic range, eg. the ability to make details visible in both light and dark areas of the image. The stability and temporal adaptation of exposure are also analyzed.
Image Quality Color Analysis examines color rendition, skin tone rendition, white balance, color shading, white balance stability and adaptation when the light changes.

Xiaomi 12 T – unstable white balance, inaccurate light skin tones, slightly limited dynamic range but good contrast

Xiaomi 11T – scene integrity artifacts (local texture movement on the floor and door at the beginning of the video), focus instability, limited dynamic range

Samsung Galaxy A22 5G – difference in sharpness between frames, inaccurate color rendering, very limited dynamic range.

Structure

112

Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra

Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra

Consistency tests analyze the level of detail and texture of real-life videos, as well as graph videos recorded in the lab. Natural video recordings are evaluated visually, with particular attention to the level of detail in bright areas and dark areas. Objective measurements are performed on images of graphs taken under various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux. The charts used are the SBMARK (DMC) chart and the Dead Leaves chart.

SBMARK CHART (DMC) detail retention video score versus lux levels

This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail retention video score with the lux level in the video. The DMC detail retention score is derived from an AI-based metric trained to evaluate texture and detail rendering on a selection of crops from our SBMARK chart.

Noise

102

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

Noise tests analyze various noise attributes such as intensity, chromaticity, grain, texture, temporal aspects on real-life video recordings and graph videos taken in the laboratory. Natural videos are evaluated visually, with a focus on noise in dark areas and high dynamic range conditions. Objective measurements are performed on card videos recorded under various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux. The graph used is the SBMARK visual noise graph.

Spatial evolution of visual noise with the level of illuminance

This graph shows the evolution of spatial visual noise with the level of lux. Spatial visual noise is measured on the visual noise graph in the video noise setting. SBMARK visual noise measurement is derived from the ISO15739 standard.

Time evolution of visual noise with the level of illuminance

This graph shows the evolution of temporal visual noise with the level of lux. Visual temporal noise is measured on the visual noise graph in the video noise setting.

Stabilization

109

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

The stabilization assessment verifies the device’s ability to stabilize footage using software or hardware technologies such as OIS, EIS, or any other means. The assessment examines residual motion, smoothness, yellow artifacts, and residual motion blur in walking and running use cases under various lighting conditions. The video below is an excerpt from one of the tested scenes.

Xiaomi 12 T – Pretty effective stabilization, slight differences in sharpness between frames

Xiaomi 11T: effective stabilization when walking, noticeable camera movement when running, difference in sharpness between frames

Samsung Galaxy A22 5G – ineffective stabilization when walking and running, difference in sharpness between frames

Manufactured goods

78

Xiaomi 12S Ultra

Xiaomi 12S Ultra

Artifacts are evaluated with MTF and ring measurements on the SFR graph in the lab, as well as frame rate measurements using the Universal Timer LED. Natural videos are visually evaluated with special attention paid to artifacts such as aliasing, quantization, locking and toning, among others. The more severe and frequent the artifact, the greater the point deduction from the score. The main artifacts and the corresponding point loss are listed below.

Main penalties for video artifacts

Let's talk about "Xiaomi 12T Camera test" with our community!
Start a new Thread

Philip Owell

Professional blogger, here to bring you new and interesting content every time you visit our blog.