We put the Huawei Mate 60 Pro through our rigorous SBMARK Display test suite to measure its performance across six criteria. In the results of this test, we will analyze how it performed in a series of tests and in several common use cases.
Overview
Key Display Specifications:
- 6.82-inch OLED (screen-to-body ratio ~89.4%)
- Dimensions: 163.6 x 79.0 x 8.1 mm (6.44 x 3.11 x 0.32 inches)
- Resolution: 1260 x 2720 pixels, (density ~440 ppi)
- Aspect ratio: 19.5:9
- Refresh rate: 120Hz
Pros
- Color rendering is accurate in most ambient lighting environments
- The touch is smooth, precise and responsive
- Readability is comfortable in most ambient lighting environments
Against
- Lacks detail in sunlight
- Long stuttering and aliasing when playing video games
- Lack of brightness and detail in darker areas when watching HDR10 video
The Huawei Mate 60 Pro’s display offers a very satisfying user experience overall, scoring an overall score a couple of points higher than its predecessor, the Mate 50 Pro. The latest version’s screen showed notable improvements in performance attributes movement and touch, as well as in the management of artifacts.
Screen readability generally maintained the same level as its predecessor, although low-light readability lacked the necessary brightness. We noticed that the device’s brightness at midnight was dimmer than the screen brightness activated in low-light conditions during the day, presumably to avoid dazzling users’ eyes with strong light in the dark. Outdoor readability, however, was quite good, with the screen’s brightness peaking at over 1700 nits (whereas its predecessor didn’t reach maximum brightness on our bench).
The device also has an option called “HDR Images” that is on by default, which improves “the display quality of high dynamic range images.” This improvement is also applied to non-HDR images, such as our models. A comparison (hue lighting environment) is shown below. When HDR Images is on, content appears more readable, but rendering loses detail in darker tones and the subject’s face appears flatter.
HDR enabled, left; HDR off, right.
Screen color remains a strong point of the Mate 60 Pro’s display, although I noticed a purple tinge when viewing photos.
Even though motion on the Mate 60 Pro was much improved over the Mate 50 Pro, the screen still tended to drop frames when playing video games.
Finally, touch interactions were fluid, pleasant, with very quick reaction times.
Test summary
About SBMARK display tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphones and other display reviews, SBMARK engineers perform a series of objective and perceptual tests under controlled laboratory and real-life conditions. Please note that we evaluate display attributes using only the device’s built-in display hardware and its still image (gallery) and video apps with default settings. (For in-depth information on how we evaluate smartphones and other displays, see our articles “How SBMARK Tests Display Quality” and “A Closer Look at SBMARK Display Tests.”
The following section brings together key elements of our comprehensive testing and analysis performed in SBMARK laboratories. Detailed performance evaluations in the form of reports are available upon request. Do not hesitate to contact us.
How the display readability score is composed
Readability evaluates the ease and comfort with which users can read fixed content (photos and web) on the display in various real-life conditions. SBMARK uses its display stand to recreate ambient light conditions ranging from total darkness to bright sunlight. In addition to laboratory tests, perceptual analysis is also carried out in real-life environments.
Readability in an indoor environment (1000 lux).
From left to right: Huawei Mate 60 Pro, Huawei Mate 50 Pro, Oppo Find X6 Pro, Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max.
(Photo for illustrative purposes only)
Readability in an outdoor environment (20,000 lux).
From left to right: Huawei Mate 60 Pro, Huawei Mate 50 Pro, Oppo Find X6 Pro, Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max.
(Photo for illustrative purposes only)
Readability in a sunny environment (>90,000 lux).
From left to right: Huawei Mate 60 Pro, Huawei Mate 50 Pro, Oppo Find X6 Pro, Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max.
(Photo for illustrative purposes only)
Measurement of luminance uniformity
This graph shows display uniformity with a gray pattern at 20%. The more visible the green color, the more uniform the display will be.
How the display color score is composed
The color attribute evaluates the device’s ability to accurately reproduce colors. The measurements taken concern fidelity, white point color and gamut coverage. We perform color evaluations for different lighting conditions to see how well the device can handle color in its surroundings. Colors are measured using a spectrophotometer in a controlled lighting environment. The perceptual analysis of the color rendering takes place compared to the reference model displayed on a calibrated professional monitor.
White point under D65 illuminant at 1000 lux
Indoor color rendering (1000 lux)
Clockwise from top left: Huawei Mate 60 Pro, Huawei Mate 50 Pro, Oppo Find X6 Pro, Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max.
(Photo for illustrative purposes only)
Color rendering in sunlight (>90,000 lux)
Clockwise from top left: Huawei Mate 60 Pro, Huawei Mate 50 Pro, Oppo Find X6 Pro, Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max.
(Photo for illustrative purposes only)
Color fidelity measurements
Huawei Mate 60 Pro, color fidelity at 1000 lux in the sRGB color space
Huawei Mate 60 Pro, color fidelity at 1000 lux in the Display-P3 color space
Each arrow represents the color difference between a target color model (arrow base) and its actual measurement (arrow tip). The longer the arrow, the more visible the color difference. If the arrow remains inside the circle the color difference will only be visible to expert eyes.
Color behavior on the corner
This graph shows the color shift when the screen is tilted. Each point represents a measurement at a particular angle. The dots inside the inner circle show no color change in the corner; those between the inner and outer circles have changes that only trained experts will see; but those that fall outside the outer circle are noted.
Color shift on the corner
From left to right: Huawei Mate 60 Pro, Huawei Mate 50 Pro, Oppo Find X6 Pro, Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max.
(Photo for illustrative purposes only)
How the Display Video score is composed
Our video attribute evaluates each device’s Standard Dynamic Range (SDR) and High Dynamic Range (HDR10) video handling in indoor and low-light conditions. We measure the tone mapping, color gamut, brightness and contrast of the display. We perform perceptual analysis Cons our professional reference monitor (Sony BVM-HX310) to ensure rendering meets artistic intent.
Video rendering in a low light environment (0 lux).
Clockwise from top left: Huawei Mate 60 Pro, Huawei Mate 50 Pro, Oppo Find X6 Pro, Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max.
(Photo for illustrative purposes only)
Clockwise from top left: Huawei Mate 60 Pro, Huawei Mate 50 Pro, Oppo Find X6 Pro, Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max.
(Photo for illustrative purposes only)
Gamut coverage for video content
Primary colors are measured in both HDR10 and SDR. The extracted color gamut shows the extent of the color area that the device can reproduce. To meet artistic intent, the measured gamma must match the primary color space of each video.
How the Display Motion Score is composed
The motion attribute evaluates dynamic content handling. Dropped frames, motion blur, and playback artifacts are examined using games and videos.
Dropped video frames
These long exposure photos have the number of frame irregularities in a 30 second video. Good performance shows a regular pattern (a flat gray image or a drop-down pattern).
How the Display Touch score is composed
To evaluate touch, SBMARK uses a touch robot and a high-speed camera to play and record a series of scenarios for evaluating smoothness, accuracy and response time.
This response time test accurately evaluates the time that elapses between a single touch of the robot on the screen and the displayed action. This test is applied to activities that require high responsiveness, such as gaming.
How the display artifact score is composed
Evaluating artifacts means checking for performance, image rendering, and motion defects that can impact the end-user experience. SBMARK precisely measures device reflectance and the presence of flicker, and evaluates the impact of residual aliasing when playing video games, among other features.
The reflectance of a simple glass plate is around 4%, while it reaches around 6% for a plastic plate. Although the first surface of smartphones is glass, their total reflectance (uncoated) is usually around 5% due to the multiple reflections created by the complex optical stack.
Aliasing (foreground)
Huawei Mate 60 Pro
(Photo for illustrative purposes only)
Start a new Thread