We put the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G through our rigorous SBMARK Display test suite to measure its performance across six criteria. In the results of this test, we will analyze how it performed in a series of tests and in several common use cases.
Overview
Key Display Specifications:
- 6.6-inch AMOLED (screen-to-body ratio ~85.8%)
- Dimensions: 161.7 x 78.0 x 8.2 mm (6.36 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches)
- Resolution: 1080 x 2340 pixels, (density ~396 ppi)
- Aspect ratio: 19.5:9
- Refresh rate: 120Hz
Pros
- Good color rendering in most lighting environments
- Good readability outdoors
- Movement while watching all types of videos and playing video games
Against
- Poor handling of unwanted touches on the screen
- Unnatural rendering of images in sunlight
- Pink to green fringes appear on the screen depending on the viewing angle
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G performed very well in our display tests thanks to its good AMOLED panel. While the A35 5G’s display specs were very similar to those of the slightly more expensive A55 5G, some performance differences could be attributed to software optimizations. However, the A35 5G managed to outperform the A55 5G in some attributes such as color, motion, and touch.
In terms of readability, the A35 5G was able to reach a measured peak brightness of 1620 nits in sunlight, which was higher than that of its competitors (even those from a higher segment), and admirably close enough to the 1638 nits measured on the A55 5G. However, with High Brightness mode enabled under sunlight, renders on the A35 may appear somewhat unnatural.
Overall, color display on the A35 5G was rendered well, although there were some pink and green fringing on the screen when viewing at an angle.
The motion results were good when compared to the general database. The Galaxy A35 is unable to read UHD 60 FPS (SDR and HDR) video, which can make the video experience uneven.
The A35 5G’s main weakness was in handling artifacts, with a high reflectance rate and a lot of screen flickering.
Test summary
About SBMARK display tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphones and other display reviews, SBMARK engineers perform a series of objective and perceptual tests under controlled laboratory and real-life conditions. Please note that we evaluate display attributes using only the device’s built-in display hardware and its still image (gallery) and video apps with default settings. (For in-depth information on how we evaluate smartphones and other displays, see our articles “How SBMARK Tests Display Quality” and “A Closer Look at SBMARK Display Tests.”
The following section brings together key elements of our comprehensive testing and analysis performed in SBMARK laboratories. Detailed performance evaluations in the form of reports are available upon request. Do not hesitate to contact us.
How the display readability score is composed
Readability evaluates the ease and comfort with which users can read fixed content (photos and web) on the display in various real-life conditions. SBMARK uses its display stand to recreate ambient light conditions ranging from total darkness to bright sunlight. In addition to laboratory tests, perceptual analysis is also carried out in real-life environments.
Readability in an indoor environment (1000 lux).
From left to right: Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, Samsung Galaxy A54 5G, Google Pixel 7a, Honor 90
(Photos are illustrative only)
Readability in a sunny environment (>90,000 lux).
From left to right: Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, Samsung Galaxy A54 5G, Google Pixel 7a, Honor 90
(Photos are illustrative only)
Measurement of luminance uniformity
This graph shows display uniformity with a gray pattern at 20%. The more visible the green color, the more uniform the display will be.
How the display color score is composed
The color attribute evaluates the device’s ability to accurately reproduce colors. The measurements taken concern fidelity, white point color and gamut coverage. We perform color evaluations for different lighting conditions to see how well the device can handle color in its surroundings. Colors are measured using a spectrophotometer in a controlled lighting environment. The perceptual analysis of the color rendering takes place compared to the reference model displayed on a calibrated professional monitor.
White point under D65 illuminant at 1000 lux
Indoor color rendering (1000 lux)
Clockwise from top left: Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, Samsung Galaxy A54 5G, Google Pixel 7a, Honor 90
(Photos are illustrative only)
Color rendering in sunlight (>90,000 lux)
Clockwise from top left: Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, Samsung Galaxy A54 5G, Google Pixel 7a, Honor 90
(Photos are illustrative only)
Color fidelity measurements
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, color fidelity at 1000 lux in the sRGB color space
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, color fidelity at 1000 lux in the Display-P3 color space
Each arrow represents the color difference between a target color model (arrow base) and its actual measurement (arrow tip). The longer the arrow, the more visible the color difference. If the arrow remains inside the circle the color difference will only be visible to expert eyes.
Color behavior on the corner
This graph shows the color shift when the screen is tilted. Each point represents a measurement at a particular angle. The dots inside the inner circle show no color change in the corner; those between the inner and outer circles have changes that only trained experts will see; but those that fall outside the outer circle are noted.
Color shift on the corner
From left to right: Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, Samsung Galaxy A54 5G, Google Pixel 7a, Honor 90
(Photos are illustrative only)
How the Display Video score is composed
Our video attribute evaluates each device’s Standard Dynamic Range (SDR) and High Dynamic Range (HDR10) video handling in indoor and low-light conditions. We measure the tone mapping, color gamut, brightness and contrast of the display. We perform perceptual analysis Cons our professional reference monitor (Sony BVM-HX310) to ensure rendering meets artistic intent.
Video rendering in a low light environment (0 lux).
Clockwise from top left: Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, Samsung Galaxy A54 5G, Google Pixel 7a, Honor 90
(Photos are illustrative only)
Clockwise from top left: Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, Samsung Galaxy A54 5G, Google Pixel 7a, Honor 90
(Photos are illustrative only)
Gamut coverage for video content
Primary colors are measured in both HDR10 and SDR. The extracted color gamut shows the extent of the color area that the device can reproduce. To meet artistic intent, the measured gamma must match the primary color space of each video.
How the Display Motion Score is composed
The motion attribute evaluates dynamic content handling. Dropped frames, motion blur, and playback artifacts are examined using games and videos.
Dropped video frames
These long exposure photos have the number of frame irregularities in a 30 second video. Good performance shows a regular pattern (a flat gray image or a drop-down pattern).
How the Display Touch score is composed
To evaluate touch, SBMARK uses a touch robot and a high-speed camera to play and record a series of scenarios for evaluating smoothness, accuracy and response time.
This response time test accurately evaluates the time that elapses between a single touch of the robot on the screen and the displayed action. This test is applied to activities that require high responsiveness, such as gaming.
How the display artifact score is composed
Evaluating artifacts means checking for performance, image rendering, and motion defects that can impact the end-user experience. SBMARK precisely measures device reflectance and the presence of flicker, and evaluates the impact of residual aliasing when playing video games, among other features.
Aliasing (foreground)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G – Crop 1
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G – Crop 2
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G – Crop 3
Start a new Thread