We subjected the Apple iPhone 13 Pro to our rigorous SBMARK Selfie test suite to measure its performance in photos and videos from an end-user perspective. This article explains how the device performed in a variety of tests and different common use cases and aims to highlight the most important results of our tests with an extract of the acquired data.

Overview

Main specifications of the front camera:

  • 12 MP 1 / 3.6 ″ sensor, lens with f / 2.2 aperture equivalent to 23 mm
  • 3D sensor
  • Cinematic mode for recording videos with shallow depth of field (1080p at 30 fps)
  • HDR video recording with Dolby Vision up to 4K at 60 fps; 4K video recording at 24/25/30/60 fps; 1080p HD video recording at 25fps, 30fps or 60fps

Pros

  • Precise exposure of the target on the face
  • Wide depth of field
  • High level of detail in indoor and outdoor conditions
  • Quite accurate depth estimate
  • Wide dynamic range and precise exposure of the target in the video
  • Accurate video white balance
  • The wide focus range means all subjects are in focus in group selfie videos.

versus

  • Luminance noise
  • Sometimes inaccurate skin tones, especially in backlit indoor scenes
  • Slight artifacts of anamorphosis (perspective distortion on faces)
  • Low subject exposure when using the flash
  • High levels of noise in the video, especially in low light conditions
  • Residual motion in walking videos
  • Loss of detail in videos in low light conditions

The Apple iPhone 13 Pro comes in the upper regions but not quite at the top of the SBMARK Selfie chart. Overall performance is very similar to last year’s iPhone 12 series, which is no surprise given the similar front camera hardware.

However, Apple has managed to improve things a bit, thanks to accurate subject exposure, a wide depth of field, and good detail in bright light and indoor shooting. The 13 Pro is a bit louder than its predecessor.

The difference is a little more noticeable for videos, making the iPhone 13 Pro one of the best devices in this category. For video, Apple has managed to improve the exposure and the color response is now more stable. The new device also has a wider dynamic range in the video.

Apple iPhone 13 Pro vs Ultra-Premium Selfie Scores

This chart compares the overall scores of SBMARK Selfie photos and videos between tested devices and references. The average and maximum scores of the price segment are also indicated. The average and maximum scores for each price segment are calculated based on the SBMARK device database.

Test summary

About SBMARK selfie tests: For scoring and analysis, SBMARK engineers capture and evaluate more than 1,500 test images in both controlled laboratory environments and natural outdoor, indoor and low-light scenes, using the front camera’s default settings. The photographic protocol is designed to take into account the user’s needs and is based on typical shooting scenarios, such as close-ups and group selfies. Assessment is done by visually inspecting images Cons a natural scene reference and making objective measurements on graphical images captured in the lab under different lighting conditions from 1 to 1,000+ lux and color temperatures from 2,300K to 6,500K. For more SBMARK Selfie Test Protocol information, please click here. More details on how we rate smartphone cameras can be found here. The following section collects the key elements of SBMARK’s comprehensive testing and analysis. Comprehensive performance evaluations are available upon request. Contact us to find out how to receive a full report.

Photo

128

Huawei P50 Pro

Huawei P50 Pro

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Photo vs Ultra-Premium scores

Photo tests analyze image quality attributes such as exposure, color, texture, and noise under various lighting conditions. Focus range and presence of artifacts on all images captured under controlled laboratory conditions and in real-life images are also evaluated. All of these attributes have a significant impact on the final quality of the images captured with the tested device and can help in understanding the main strengths and weaknesses of the camera.

Exposure

86

Huawei P50 Pro

Huawei P50 Pro

Color

84

Google Pixel 6 Pro

Google Pixel 6 Pro

Exposure and color are the key attributes for technically good images. For exposure, the main attribute evaluated is the brightness of the face in various use cases and lighting conditions. Other factors evaluated are contrast and dynamic range, eg. the ability to make details visible in both light and dark areas of the image. Repeatability is also important because it demonstrates the camera’s ability to deliver the same rendering when shooting consecutive images in a row.
For color, the analyzed image quality attributes are skin tone rendering, white balance, color shading, and repeatability.

Target face exposure is generally accurate. These samples show the Apple iPhone 13 Pro’s exposure performance in an outdoor scene.

Apple iPhone 13 Pro, precise target exposure for the face

Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, precise target exposure for the face

Huawei P50 Pro, precise target exposure for the face

Color is generally good, but our testers found some inaccuracies in backlit mixed lighting conditions. These samples show the color performance of the Apple iPhone 13 Pro in an indoor scene.

Apple iPhone 13 Pro, orange skin tone rendering

Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, orange skin tone rendering

Huawei P50 Pro, skin tone accurate rendering

Focus

91

Huawei P50 Pro

Huawei P50 Pro

Autofocus tests evaluate the accuracy of focusing on the subject’s face, the repeatability of precise focus, and depth of field. While a shallow depth of field can be nice for a single-subject selfie or close-up shot, it can be problematic in specific conditions like group selfies; both situations are tested. The accuracy of the focus is also evaluated in all real images taken, from 30 cm to 150 cm, and in low light conditions up to the outdoors.

This graph compares the Apple iPhone 13 Pro’s focusing performance at different subject distances.

The fixed focus lens of the iPhone 13 Pro captures high levels of sharpness at all distances

Structure

72

Asus ZenFone 7 Pro

Asus ZenFone 7 Pro

Texture tests analyze the level of detail and texture of subjects in images taken in the laboratory as well as in real-life scenarios. For natural shots, special attention is paid to the level of detail in the facial features, such as the eyes. Objective measurements are performed on map images taken under various lighting conditions from 1 to 1000 lux and different types of dynamic range conditions. The charts used are the proprietary SBMARK (DMC) chart and the Dead Leaves chart.

This graph shows the texture performance of the Apple iPhone 13 Pro in the laboratory under different light levels.

Texture comparison: Typically high levels of detail are captured in outdoor (1000 lux) and indoor (100 lux) lighting conditions.

These samples show the texture performance of the Apple iPhone 13 Pro in an outdoor selfie at a shooting distance of 55cm.

Apple iPhone 13 Pro, texture, 55 cm

Apple iPhone 13 Pro, crop: high level of detail

Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, texture, 55 cm

Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, crop: high level of detail

Huawei P50 Pro, texture, 55 cm

Huawei P50 Pro, crop: high level of detail

Noise

62

Huawei P40 Pro

Huawei P40 Pro

Noise tests analyze various noise attributes such as intensity, chromaticity, grain and texture on real life images as well as graphical images taken in the laboratory. For natural images, special attention is paid to noise on faces, but also on dark areas and in conditions of high dynamic range. Objective measurements are performed on graphical images taken under various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux and different types of dynamic range conditions. The graph used is the SBMARK Dead Leaves graph and standardized measurement such as visual noise derived from ISO 15739.

This graph shows the noise performance of the Apple iPhone 13 Pro in the laboratory under different light levels.

Visual noise is a metric that measures the noise perceived by end users. It takes into account the sensitivity of the human eye to different spatial frequencies under different observation conditions.

Noise comparison: Luminance noise is visible under most conditions tested.

These samples show the noise performance of the Apple iPhone 13 Pro under indoor lighting conditions.

Apple iPhone 13 Pro, visual noise

Apple iPhone 13 Pro, crop: noise is visible

Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, visual noise

Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, crop: noise is visible

Huawei P50 Pro, visual noise

Huawei P50 Pro, crop: the noise is well controlled

Manufactured goods

83

Google Pixel 6 Pro

Google Pixel 6 Pro

Artifact evaluation examines lens shading, chromatic aberrations, distortion measurement on the dot and MTF chart, and ring measurements on the SFR chart in the lab. Particular attention is paid, among other things, to ghosting, quantization, halos and variations of shades on the face. The more severe and frequent the artifact, the greater the point deduction from the score. The main artifacts observed and the corresponding point loss are listed below.

These samples show slight instability in distortion correction on consecutive shots. The camera was mounted on a tripod to acquire these samples. If you look closely at the edges you can see that the field of view is slightly wider on the left image.

Apple iPhone 13 Pro, slightly wider field of view

Apple iPhone 13 Pro, slightly narrower field of view

Main penalties for photographic artifacts

Bokeh

75

Improve

Highest score

Bokeh is tested in a dedicated mode, usually in portrait or aperture mode, and analyzed by visually inspecting all images captured in the lab and under natural conditions. The goal is to reproduce portrait photography comparable to that taken with a DSLR and a wide aperture. The main image quality attributes to look out for are depth estimation, artifacts, blur gradient, and bokeh blur spotlight shape. The attributes of the portrait image quality (exposure, color, texture) are also taken into account.

These samples show the Apple iPhone 13 Pro’s bokeh mode performance in an outdoor scene.

Apple iPhone 13 Pro, accurate depth estimate for the subject

Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, similar results to iPhone 13 Pro

Huawei P50 Pro, no blur gradient but very good depth estimate

video

143

Huawei P50 Pro

Huawei P50 Pro

About SBMARK Selfie Video Tests

SBMARK engineers capture and evaluate more than 2 hours of video in controlled laboratory environments and natural scenes in low light conditions, indoors and outdoors, using the default settings of the front camera. The assessment consists of visually inspecting natural videos taken under various conditions and carrying out objective measurements on graphical videos recorded in the laboratory under different conditions from 1 to 1000+ lux and color temperatures from 2,300 K to 6,500 K.

Apple iPhone 13 Pro vs Ultra-Premium video scores

Video tests analyze the same image quality attributes as still images, such as exposure, color, texture, or noise, as well as temporal aspects such as speed, exposure uniformity and stability, white balance, and autofocus transitions.

The Apple iPhone 13 Pro achieves a selfie video score of 95. A device’s overall video score is derived from its performance and results on a number of attributes in the same way as the photo score. In this section, we take a closer look at these sub-scores and compare the video image quality to the competition.

Exposure

86

Improve

Highest score

Color

87

Improve

Highest score

Exposure tests evaluate facial brightness and dynamic range, eg. the ability to make details visible in both light and dark areas of the image. The stability and temporal adaptation of exposure are also analyzed. Image quality color analysis examines skin tone rendition, white balance, color shading, white balance stability, and its adaptation when the light changes.

These video samples show the video exposure performance of the Apple iPhone 13 Pro under indoor lighting conditions.

Apple iPhone 13 Pro, precise target exposure with wide dynamic range. Adaptation to exposure is also quick and smooth with no visible instabilities

Huawei P50 Pro, less facial exposure

These video samples show the Apple iPhone 13 Pro’s video color performance in an outdoor scene.

Apple iPhone 13 Pro, pleasant and natural skin tone with neutral white balance

Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, very similar to the iPhone 13 Pro with slightly higher saturation

Huawei P50 Pro, cold white balance with inaccurate rendering on light to medium skin types

Structure

73

Asus ZenFone 6

Asus ZenFone 6

Consistency tests analyze the level of detail and texture of real-life videos, as well as graph videos recorded in the lab. Natural video recordings are evaluated visually, with particular attention to the level of detail of the facial features. Objective measurements are performed on images of graphs taken under various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux. The chart used is the Dead Leaves chart.

Evolution of the sharpness of the texture with the level of illuminance

This graph shows the evolution of texture sharpness with the lux level for two sealing conditions. Texture sharpness is measured on the Dead Leaves graph in the Close-up Dead Leaves setting.

Texture retention in video is good, but slightly outperformed by the other devices in this comparison.

These video samples show the Apple iPhone 13 Pro’s video texture performance under lighting conditions of 100 lux and a distance of 55cm in the laboratory.

Apple iPhone 13 Pro, the level of detail is good, but lower than the Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)

Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, the level of detail is good, but lower than the Apple iPhone 13 Pro

Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon), high level of texture with many fine details

Noise

56

Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra

Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra

Noise tests analyze various noise attributes such as intensity, chromaticity, grain, texture, temporal aspects on real-life video recordings and graph videos taken in the laboratory. Natural videos are evaluated visually, with particular attention to noise on faces. Objective measurements are performed on card videos recorded under various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux. The graph used is the SBMARK visual noise graph.

Spatial evolution of visual noise with the level of illuminance

This graph shows the evolution of spatial visual noise with the level of lux. Spatial visual noise is measured on the visual noise graph in the video noise setting. SBMARK visual noise measurement is derived from the ISO15739 standard.

Time evolution of visual noise with the level of illuminance

This graph shows the evolution of temporal visual noise with the level of lux. Visual temporal noise is measured on the visual noise graph in the video noise setting.

These video images show the video noise performance of the Apple iPhone 13 Pro in indoor light conditions.

Apple iPhone 13 Pro, the strong luminance noise is visible in all conditions and especially in low light conditions

Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, strong luminance noise is also visible but it is slightly better than the 13 Pro

Huawei P50 Pro, noise reduction is very efficient, even in videos in low light conditions

Stabilization

78

Huawei Mate 40 Pro

Huawei Mate 40 Pro

The stabilization assessment verifies the device’s ability to stabilize footage using software or hardware technologies such as OIS, EIS, or any other means. The assessment examines overall residual motion on the face and background, smoothness and yellow artifacts, during walking and panning use cases under various lighting conditions. The video below is an excerpt from one of the tested scenes.

This sample clip shows the video stabilization of the Apple iPhone 13 Pro in outdoor conditions.

Apple iPhone 13 Pro, some residual movements are visible in the background of videos captured while walking

Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, stabilization behavior very similar to the Apple iPhone 13 Pro

Huawei P50 Pro stabilization is more effective than both iPhones with less visible residual motion

Manufactured goods

87

Apple iPhone 12 mini

Apple iPhone 12 mini

Artifacts are evaluated with MTF and ring measurements on the SFR graph in the lab, as well as frame rate measurements using the Universal Timer LED. Natural videos are visually evaluated with special attention to artifacts such as quantization, hue shift, and face rendering artifacts, among others. The more severe and frequent the artifact, the greater the point deduction from the score. The main artifacts and the corresponding point loss are listed below

Main penalties for video artifacts

This graph shows the ringing video output of the Apple iPhone 13 Pro. This curve shows the normalized edge profile of the maximum ring in the field.

Ringing: Lab measurements show the iPhone 13 Pro exhibits more rings than some of its competitors, but no other serious artifacts are visible in its videos

Let's talk about "Apple iPhone 13 Pro Selfie test" with our community!
Start a new Thread

Philip Owell

Professional blogger, here to bring you new and interesting content every time you visit our blog.