We subjected the Xiaomi 13 Pro to our rigorous SBMARK Camera test suite to measure its performance in terms of photo, video and zoom quality from an end-user perspective. This article analyzes how the device performed in a variety of tests and several common use cases and aims to highlight the most important results of our tests with an excerpt of the data captured.

Overview

Main camera specs:

  • Primary: 1.0-inch 50MP sensor, 23mm-equivalent f/1.9 aperture lens, Dual Pixel PDAF, OIS
  • Ultra Wide Angle: 50 MP, 14mm equivalent f/2.2 aperture lens, AF
  • Telephoto: 50MP, 75mm equivalent f/2.0 aperture lens, PDAF

Pros

  • Good exposure and detail in photos and videos
  • Wide dynamic range down to very low light in the photo
  • Neutral white balance in bright light, generally pleasant colors
  • Good quality zoom at close to medium tele settings

Against

  • Some exposure instability and tone compression in high contrast scenes
  • Artifacts of the halo in the photo
  • Frequent delays between activating the shutter button and capturing the image, especially in high contrast conditions
  • Some autofocus errors

With a SBMARK Camera score of 136, the Xiaomi 13 Pro performed well in our tests, offering a bright exposure, nice colors and good detail capture in both photo and video modes. In addition, the camera was able to produce high image quality at close-to-mid telephoto settings, and recorded still images with a wide dynamic range, even in low-light conditions.

The 13 Pro’s camera has similar hardware to the Xiaomi 12S Ultra, but there are some differences to note. The main module uses the same large 50MP 1.0-type sensor, but the telephoto setup of the 13 Pro is different. The 13 Pro’s telephoto lens doesn’t use the periscope design of the 12S Ultra but features a shorter focal length that has better light-gathering capabilities. Another difference is that the 13 Pro is powered by Qualcomm’s latest Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset instead of the first generation variant of the 12S Ultra. Both models have Leica branded lenses and Leica color modes. We ran all SBMARK camera tests on the Vibrant setting, just as we did with the 12S Ultra.

Overall camera performance was very similar between the two devices, with differences in a few secondary attributes. Notably, the shorter tele on the 13 Pro resulted in lower image quality at long-range tele settings. However, it improved over the 12S Ultra at close- and medium-range settings, especially when shooting in low light.

Xiaomi 13 Pro – Good exposure, vivid colors

Compared to the current smartphone camera No. 1 in the SBMARK camera rankings, the Honor Magic5 Pro, the Xiaomi 13 Pro lagged slightly behind in several areas, despite its larger image sensor. In terms of exposure, the Xiaomi showed unnatural contrast in backlit conditions that was much less noticeable on the Honor. Our experts also observed a better texture/noise trade-off on the Honor, even in low-light conditions. Given the Magic5 Pro’s smaller sensor and lack of optical image stabilization, this was an unexpected result. In video mode, both exposure and focus were much less stable on the Xiaomi 13 Pro than on the Honor.

Trial summary

About SBMARK Camera Tests: SBMARK’s camera evaluations are conducted in labs and in real-world situations using a wide variety of subjects. Scores are based on objective tests for which results are calculated directly by the measurement software on our lab setups and perceptual tests where a sophisticated set of metrics allows a panel of image experts to compare aspects of quality of the image that require human judgment. Testing a smartphone involves a team of engineers and technicians for about a week. Photo, zoom, and video quality are rated separately and then combined into an overall score for comparing cameras from different devices. For more information on the SBMARK camera protocol, click here. More details on smartphone camera scores can be found here. The following section compiles the key elements of SBMARK’s exhaustive testing and analysis. Full performance evaluations are available upon request. Please contact us on how to receive a full report.

Xiaomi 13 Pro vs Ultra-Premium camera scores

This graph compares the SBMARK photo, zoom and video scores between the tested device and the references. The average and maximum scores of the price segment are also indicated. The average and maximum scores for each price segment are calculated based on the SBMARK database of tested devices.

Photo

136

Honor Magic5 Pro

Honor Magic5 Pro

SBMARK camera photo test information

For scoring and analysis, SBMARK engineers capture and evaluate more than 2,600 test images in both controlled laboratory environments and outdoor, indoor, and low-light natural scenes using camera presets. The photographic protocol is designed to take into account the main use cases and is based on typical shooting scenarios, such as portrait, family and landscape photography. Evaluation is performed by visually inspecting images Cons a natural scene reference and by performing objective measurements on laboratory-acquired graph images under various lighting conditions from 1 to 1,000+ lux and color temperatures from 2,300 K to 6,500 K.

Still images captured with the Xiaomi 13 Pro offered a wide dynamic range, but our testers noted some contrast issues on faces and a halo effect around subjects that appeared when HDR processing kicked in. Overall, the 13 Pro’s exposure performance was quite similar to the 12S Ultra we’ve previously tested. The same was true for color, but the Xiaomi 13 Pro delivered a slightly more neutral white balance in daytime shots. The 13 Pro also managed to capture a high level of detail and keep noise levels low. That said, they weren’t quite as low as on the 12S Ultra. Unlike some previous Xiaomi models, the 13 Pro doesn’t feature zero shutter lag, and in some scenes, our testers observed a noticeable lag between pressing the shutter button on the display and actually capturing the shot. ‘image.

Xiaomi 13 Pro Photo scores vs Ultra-Premium

Photo tests analyze image quality attributes such as exposure, color, texture and noise under various lighting conditions. Autofocus performance and the presence of artifacts are also evaluated on all images acquired under controlled laboratory conditions and on real-life images. All of these attributes have a significant impact on the final quality of the images captured with the tested device and can help you understand the main strengths and weaknesses of the camera.

Xiaomi 13 Pro comes with a 50MP capture mode. However, the default 12MP mode was used for our tests.

Exposure

105

Honor Magic5 Pro

Honor Magic5 Pro

Exposure is one of the key attributes for technically good images. The main attribute evaluated is the brightness of the main subject across various use cases such as landscape, portrait or still life. Other factors evaluated are contrast and dynamic range, e.g. the ability to make details visible in light and dark areas of the image. Repeatability is also important because it demonstrates the camera’s ability to provide the same rendering when taking multiple images of the same scene.

Xiaomi 13 Pro – Wide dynamic range, contrast issues on faces and background

Xiaomi 12S Ultra – Wide dynamic range, contrast issues on faces and background

Vivo x90 Pro+ – Wide dynamic range, fewer contrast issues

The Xiaomi 13 Pro offered a bright exposure and a wide dynamic range on most occasions. However, our testers did notice some tone-mapping and contrast issues that were particularly noticeable in backlit portrait shots. The Honor Magic5 Pro also offered a wide dynamic range but with fewer contrast issues.

Xiaomi 13 Pro – Wide dynamic range, contrast issues on faces and background affecting the color of faces

Honor Magic5 Pro – Wide dynamic range but good contrast and color on faces.

Color

104

Google Pixel 7 Pro

Google Pixel 7 Pro

Color is one of the key attributes for technically good images. Image quality attributes analyzed are skin tone rendering, white balance, color shading, and repeatability. With regards to color rendition and skin tone, we penalize unnatural colors but respect the manufacturer’s choice of color signature.

For our tests, we used the Leica Vibrant picture mode. Authentic mode applies slightly lower saturation levels, but the difference would have had no impact on our score. The choice of mode depends on personal taste.

As we had previously seen on the Xiaomi 12S Ultra, colors were usually saturated and pleasing on the 13 Pro. However, we did notice some skin tone issues, especially in backlit scenes like the one above. Our testers found white balance to be more accurate than on the 12S Ultra in various conditions.

Xiaomi 13 Pro – Pleasant warm fusion

Xiaomi 12S Ultra – Light cold casting

Vivo x90 Pro+ – Cast too hot

Auto focus

ninety two

Huawei Mate 50 Pro

Huawei Mate 50 Pro

Autofocus tests focus on focus accuracy, focus repeatability, shutter lag, and depth of field. Shutter lag is the difference between when the user presses the capture button and when the image is actually taken. It includes the speed of focusing and the ability of the device to capture images at the right moment, the so-called “zero shutter lag” capability. While a shallow depth of field can be nice for a single-subject portrait or close-up shot, it can also be a problem in some specific conditions like group portraits; Both situations are tested. Focus accuracy is also evaluated in all real-life images taken, from infinity to close-up objects and low-light to outdoor conditions.

Autofocus irregularity and speed: 20Lux Δ7EV Tungsten Handheld

This graph illustrates focus accuracy and speed, and also zero shutter lag capability by showing edge acuity versus shooting time measured on the AFHDR setup over a series of images. All photos were taken at 20Lux with tungsten illuminant, 500ms after blurring. In this scenario, the backlit panels in the scene are set to simulate a fairly high dynamic range: the luminance ratio between the brightest spot and an 18% reflective gray spot is 7, which we denote by an exposure value difference of 7 The edge sharpness is measured on the four edges of the Dead Leaves graph and the shooting time is measured on the Universal Timer LED.

As we had previously seen on the 12S Ultra, the Xiaomi 13 Pro often failed to capture the image at the exact moment the shutter was pressed, making it difficult to capture the decisive moment.

Xiaomi 13 Pro – The photographer tried to capture the image just before the model kicked the ball but missed the moment due to the delay.

Honor Magic5 Pro – Image captured when the user pulls the trigger. The color and texture level are also significantly better.

Structure

105

Honor Magic5 Pro

Honor Magic5 Pro

Texture tests analyze the level of detail and texture of subjects in images taken in the lab as well as real-life scenarios. For natural shots, special attention is paid to the level of detail in the light and dark areas of the image. Objective measurements are performed on map images taken under various lighting conditions from 1 to 1000 lux and different types of dynamic range conditions. The charts used are the proprietary SBMARK (DMC) chart and the Dead Leaves chart.

SBMARK CHART (DMC) Detail Retention Score vs. Lux Levels for Tripod and Handheld Conditions

This graph shows the evolution of the DMC Retention of Detail score with lux level, for two holding conditions. The DMC Detail Retention Score is derived from an AI-powered metric trained to evaluate texture and detail rendition on a selection of crops from our SBMARK chart.

Xiaomi 13 Pro – Details in low light conditions

Xiaomi 13 Pro – Loss of fine details

Honor Magic5 Pro – Unclear texture

Honor Magic5 Pro – High level of detail

Noise

103

Honor Magic5 Pro

Honor Magic5 Pro

Noise tests analyze various noise attributes such as intensity, chromaticity, grain, texture on real-life images and lab-captured graph images. For natural images, special attention is paid to noise on faces, landscapes, but also dark areas and high dynamic range conditions. Noise on moving objects is also evaluated on natural images. Objective measurements are performed on chart images captured under various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux and different types of dynamic range conditions. The graph used is the dead leaves graph and standardized measurement such as visual noise derived from ISO 15739.

Evolution of visual noise with illuminance levels in portable conditions

This graph shows the evolution of the visual noise metric with lux level under palmar conditions. The Visual Noise metric is the average of the Visual Noise measurement across all patches of the Dead Leaves graph in the AFHDR configuration. The SBMARK visual noise measurement is derived from the ISO15739 standard.

Artifacts

71

Google Pixel 6

Google Pixel 6

Artifact assessment examines lens shading, chromatic aberrations, geometric distortion, ringing edges, halos, ghosting, quantization, unexpected color tone shifts, among other types of possible effects unnatural on photos. The more serious and frequent the artifact, the greater the deduction of points from the score. The main artifacts observed and the corresponding loss of points are listed below.

Major penalties for photographic artifacts

Bokeh

60

Honor Magic5 Pro

Honor Magic5 Pro

Bokeh is tested in a dedicated mode, usually portrait or aperture mode, and analyzed by visually inspecting all images captured in laboratory and natural conditions. The goal is to reproduce a portrait photograph comparable to one taken with a DLSR and a wide aperture. The main image quality attributes paid attention to are depth estimation, artifacts, blur gradient, and bokeh blur reflector shape. Vertical image quality attributes (exposure, color, texture) are also taken into consideration.

Xiaomi 13 Pro – Unnatural blur gradient on the tree, segmentation errors between the model’s face and hair

Honor Magic5 Pro – Natural blur gradient on the tree, accurate subject segmentation

Preview

70

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

The preview tests analyze the image quality of the camera app’s image preview, with particular attention to the difference between the capture and the preview, especially regarding the dynamic range and the application of the bokeh effect. The uniformity of exposure, color and focus adaptation when zooming from the minimum to the maximum available zoom factor is also evaluated. The preview frame rate is measured using the Universal Timer LED.

Xiaomi 13 Pro – Capture – Wide dynamic range

Xiaomi 13 Pro – Preview – No HDR rendering applied to preview image, limited dynamic range

Zoom in

143

Honor Magic5 Pro

Honor Magic5 Pro

About SBMARK Camera Zoom Tests

SBMARK engineers capture and evaluate over 400 test images in controlled laboratory environments and natural outdoor, indoor, and low-light scenes using camera presets and pinch zoom at various zoom factors from ultra wide to very long zoom. Evaluation is performed by visually inspecting images Cons a natural scene reference and by performing objective measurements of lab-captured map images under varying conditions from 20 to 1000 lux and color temperatures from 2300K to 6500K.

The Xiaomi 13 Pro comes with a three-camera setup that has almost become standard for high-end smartphones: an ultra-wide-angle camera, a 50MP primary module and a dedicated telephoto. The telephoto focal length is slightly shorter than on the 12S Ultra, which predictably resulted in lower image quality at long-range telephoto settings in our tests. However, the 13 Pro did better at close- and medium-range settings, especially when shooting in low light.

Xiaomi 13 Pro Zoom Scores vs Ultra-Premium

This graph illustrates the relative scores for the different zoom ranges evaluated. The abscissa is expressed in focal length equivalent to 35mm. Zoomed scores appear on the right and zoomed scores on the left.

Wide

106

Huawei Mate 50 Pro

Huawei Mate 50 Pro

These tests analyze the performance of the ultra wide angle camera at different focal lengths from 12mm to 20mm. All attributes of image quality are evaluated, with particular attention to artifacts such as chromatic aberrations, lens softness and distortion. The images below are an excerpt from the tested scenes.

Xiaomi 13 Pro – Slight underexposure

Xiaomi 12S Ultra – Good visibility

Vivo x90 Pro+ – Good but slightly brighter exposure

tele

106

Honor Magic4 Ultimate

Honor Magic4 Ultimate

All image quality attributes are evaluated at focal lengths from approximately 40mm to 300mm, with an emphasis on texture and detail. The score comes from a series of objective laboratory measurements and perceptual analysis of real-life images.

For a mid-range telephoto smartphone camera, the Xiaomi 13 Pro offered very good telephoto performance, but was overtaken by the current leader, the Honor Magic5 Pro, at most telephoto zoom settings. , as can be seen in the examples and graphs below.

Xiaomi 13 Pro – Mid-range Tele

Xiaomi 13 Pro – Fine details are lost

Honor Magic5 Pro – Mid-range Tele

Honor Magic5 Pro – Visible fine details

SBMARK CHART Detail Retention Score (DMC) by focal length

This graph shows the evolution of the DMC Detail Retention score versus the full-frame equivalent focal length for different lighting conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance, and the y-axis represents the maximum detail retention metric score: higher value means better quality. Large dots correspond to the zoom ratio available in the camera application UI.

SBMARK CHART Detail Retention Score (DMC) by focal length

This graph shows the evolution of the DMC Detail Retention score versus the full-frame equivalent focal length for different lighting conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance, and the y-axis represents the maximum detail retention metric score: higher value means better quality. Large dots correspond to the zoom ratio available in the camera application UI.

SBMARK CHART Detail Retention Score (DMC) by focal length

This graph shows the evolution of the DMC Detail Retention score versus the full-frame equivalent focal length for different lighting conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance, and the y-axis represents the maximum detail retention metric score: higher value means better quality. Large dots correspond to the zoom ratio available in the camera application UI.

SBMARK CHART Detail Retention Score (DMC) by focal length

This graph shows the evolution of the DMC Detail Retention score versus the full-frame equivalent focal length for different lighting conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance, and the y-axis represents the maximum detail retention metric score: higher value means better quality. Large dots correspond to the zoom ratio available in the camera application UI.

Compared to the predecessor 12S Ultra, the Xiaomi 13 Pro performed better at close and medium distances, particularly in low light conditions.

Xiaomi 13 Pro – Mid-range Tele

Xiaomi 13 Pro – Slight loss of details

Xiaomi 12S Ultra – Mid-range Tele

Xiaomi 12S Ultra – Strong loss of details

Vivo x90 Pro+ – Mid-range camera

Vivo x90 Pro+ – Slight loss of details

video

129

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

About SBMARK Camera Video Tests

SBMARK engineers capture and evaluate more than 2.5 hours of video in controlled lab environments and low natural light scenes, indoors and out, using the camera’s default settings. Evaluation consists of visually inspecting natural video taken under various conditions and performing objective measurements on lab-recorded graph video under various conditions from 1 to 1000+ lux and color temperatures from 2,300K to 6,500K.

The video mode of the Xiaomi 13 Pro was tested with a 4K resolution and a variable frame rate of 60 fps. At these settings, it performed quite well compared to the competition in its segment, delivering pretty good exposure, wide dynamic range, and nice colors when recording in daylight or indoor conditions. It also managed to strike a good balance between detail retention and noise reduction in all lighting conditions. Compared to the 12S Ultra, it offers more beautiful colors and more stable exposure. However, we observed more instability in terms of autofocus.

Xiaomi 13 Pro Video scores vs Ultra-Premium

Video tests analyze the same image quality attributes as still images, such as exposure, color, texture or noise, as well as temporal aspects such as speed, exposure uniformity and stability, white balance and autofocus transitions.

Exposure

99

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

Exposure tests evaluate the brightness of the main subject and the dynamic range, e.g. the ability to make details visible in light and dark areas of the image. The stability and temporal adaptation of the exposure are also analysed.

Xiaomi 13 Pro – Smooth transition of exposure

Xiaomi 12S Ultra – Exposure instability towards the end of the transition

Vivo x90 Pro+ – Smooth but slightly laggy exposure transition

Color

107

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

Image quality color analysis examines color rendition, skin tone rendition, white balance, color shading, white balance stability and its adaptation when the light changes.

Xiaomi 13 Pro – Accurate color rendition and skin tones

Xiaomi 12S Ultra – Cool cast affects skin tones

Auto focus

87

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

Xiaomi 13 Pro – Focus on breathing at the beginning of the clip

Xiaomi 12S Ultra – No concentrated breathing

Vivo x90 Pro+ – No focused breathing

Xiaomi 13 Pro – Frequent refocus

Honor Magic5 Pro – No focus issues

Structure

107

Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra

Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra

Texture tests analyze the level of detail and texture of real-life videos as well as graphics videos recorded in the lab. Natural video recordings are evaluated visually, with particular attention to the level of detail in bright areas and dark areas. Objective measurements of card images taken under various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux are performed. The charts used are the SBMARK (DMC) chart and the Dead Leaves chart.

This graph shows the evolution of texture sharpness with lux level.
Texture sharpness is measured on the deadleaves graph in the video deadleaves setup.

Noise

109

Samsung Galaxy A23 5G

Samsung Galaxy A23 5G

Noise tests analyze various noise attributes such as intensity, chromaticity, grain, texture, temporal aspects on real-life video recording, as well as graph videos taken in the lab. Natural videos are evaluated visually, with an emphasis on noise in dark areas and high dynamic range conditions. Objective measurements are performed on graph videos recorded under various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux. The graph used is the SBMARK visual noise graph.

Evolution of spatial visual noise with level of illumination

This graph shows the evolution of spatial visual noise with lux level. Spatial visual noise is measured on the visual noise table in the video noise setup. The SBMARK visual noise measurement is derived from the ISO15739 standard.

Time evolution of visual noise with level of illumination

This graph shows the evolution of visual noise over time with lux level. Temporal visual noise is measured on the visual noise table in the video noise setup.

Xiaomi 13 Pro – Dim frame

Xiaomi 13 Pro – High noise level

Honor Magic5 Pro – Dim frame

Honor Magic5 Pro – Low noise level with better textures and details

Stabilization

112

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

The stabilization rating tests the device’s ability to stabilize footage using software or hardware technologies such as OIS, EIS, or any other means. The evaluation looks at residual motion, smoothness, gel artifacts, and residual motion blur in walking and running use cases under various lighting conditions. The video below is an excerpt from one of the tested scenes.

Xiaomi 13 Pro – No frame change

Xiaomi 12S Ultra – Moving the frame

Vivo x90 Pro+ – No frame switching

Artifacts

84

Xiaomi 12S Ultra

Xiaomi 12S Ultra

Artifacts are evaluated with MTF and ringing measurements on the SFR graph in the lab, as well as frame rate measurements using the Universal Timer LED. Natural videos are visually evaluated by paying close attention to artifacts such as aliasing, quantization, blocking, and pitch shifting, among others. The more severe and frequent the artifact, the more points will be deducted from the score. The main artifacts and the corresponding point loss are listed below.

Top penalties for video artifacts

Let's talk about "Xiaomi 13 Pro Camera test" with our community!
Start a new Thread

Philip Owell

Professional blogger, here to bring you new and interesting content every time you visit our blog.