We subjected the Oppo Reno8 Pro 5G to our rigorous SBMARK Camera test suite to measure its performance in terms of photo, video and zoom quality from an end-user perspective. This article explains how the device performed in a variety of tests and different common use cases and aims to highlight the most important results of our tests with an extract of the acquired data.

Overview

Key Camera Specifications:

  • Main: 50 MP sensor, 86º field of view, f / 1.8 aperture lens, AF
  • Ultra-wide: 8 MP sensor, 112º field of view, f / 2.2 aperture lens
  • Macro: 2 MP sensor, 89º field of view, f / 2.4 aperture lens

Pros

  • Accurate exposure, generally wide dynamic range
  • Pretty good details in photos and videos
  • Stable autofocus and wide depth of field in the photo
  • Well controlled noise in the video

versus

  • Often inaccurate color in photos and videos
  • Compression of tones in HDR portraits
  • Noise in the picture
  • Occasional ghost and halo in the photo
  • Occasional autofocus that breathes in the video
  • White balance instability in the video
  • Move texture artifacts in low-light videos
  • Loss of fine detail with medium and long range telephoto zoom

With a SBMARK Camera score of 114, the Oppo Reno 8 Pro 5G occupies a central position in the ranking of the Premium segment. The overall camera performance was acceptable for the price range, with photos, videos, and even decent telephoto zoom results, despite the lack of a dedicated telephoto lens. In general, image quality and performance tend to be quite good in bright light and typical indoor conditions. However, there was a noticeable drop in quality once the camera was used in low light conditions. This was especially true of the video mode.

When shooting still images, the camera provided precise exposure and a wide dynamic range in most conditions, capturing good details of highlights and shadows. However, portrait images taken in high-contrast lighting conditions were subject to tone compression artifacts. Autofocus was a bit slow in some situations, but it was stable. A large depth of field meant that elements that were behind or in front of the main subject were still made sharp enough. The images offered good detail, but this came at the expense of noticeable image noise. Color could be better too, with still images often displaying unsightly colors. Our testers also noticed ghosting and halo artifacts in scenes with moving elements or when shooting in high contrast conditions.

When using the telephoto zoom, fine details were lost at medium and long range settings, but overall the telephoto zoom did a pretty good job considering there was no dedicated telephoto lens. The image quality of the ultra-wide camera was also quite good.

The video clips with the Oppo were delivered with good exposure and dynamic range, but the exposure instabilities were quite noticeable. The same was true for the instabilities and white balance casts. As with the photos, the colors sometimes looked slightly unsightly. Autofocus breathing could also be quite intrusive. On the plus side, the video stabilization worked quite well, doing a good job of compensating for camera shake.

Oppo Reno8 Pro 5G camera scores compared to Premium

This chart compares the SBMARK photo, zoom and video scores between the tested device and the references. The average and maximum scores of the price segment are also indicated. The average and maximum scores for each price segment are calculated based on the SBMARK database of tested devices.

Test summary

About SBMARK Camera Tests: SBMARK camera assessments take place in labs and real-world situations using a wide variety of subjects. Scores are based on objective tests for which results are calculated directly by the measurement software on our laboratory settings and on perceptual tests in which a sophisticated set of metrics allows a group of image experts to compare aspects of quality image that require human judgment. Testing a smartphone involves a team of engineers and technicians for about a week. The quality of photo, zoom and video is evaluated separately and then combined into an overall score for comparing cameras from different devices. For more information on the SBMARK Camera protocol, click here. More details on the smartphone camera scores can be found here. The following section collects the key elements of SBMARK’s comprehensive testing and analysis. Comprehensive performance evaluations are available upon request. Contact us to find out how to receive a full report.

Photo

125

Honor Magic4 Ultimate

Honor Magic4 Ultimate

About SBMARK Camera Photo Tests

For scoring and analysis, SBMARK engineers capture and evaluate more than 2,600 test images in both controlled laboratory environments and natural outdoor, indoor and low-light scenes, using the camera’s default settings. The photographic protocol is designed to take into account the main use cases and is based on typical shooting scenarios, such as portraits, family photographs and landscapes. Evaluation is done by visually inspecting images Cons a natural scene reference and making objective measurements on graphical images captured in the lab under various lighting conditions from 1 to 1,000+ lux and color temperatures from 2,300K to 6,500K.

Photo ratings of Oppo Reno8 Pro 5G

Photo tests analyze image quality attributes such as exposure, color, texture, and noise under various lighting conditions. Autofocus performance and the presence of artifacts on all images acquired under controlled laboratory conditions and in real-life images are also evaluated. All of these attributes have a significant impact on the final quality of the images captured with the tested device and can help in understanding the main strengths and weaknesses of the camera.

Exposure

110

Honor Magic4 Ultimate

Honor Magic4 Ultimate

Color

100

Google Pixel 7 Pro

Google Pixel 7 Pro

Exposure and color are the key attributes for technically good images. For exposure, the main attribute evaluated is the brightness of the main subject in various use cases such as landscape, portrait or still life. Other factors evaluated are contrast and dynamic range, eg. the ability to make details visible in both light and dark areas of the image. Repeatability is also important because it demonstrates the camera’s ability to deliver the same rendering when shooting multiple images of the same scene.
For color, the analyzed image quality attributes are skin tone rendering, white balance, color shading, and repeatability. For the rendering of color and skin tone, we penalize unnatural colors but respect the manufacturer’s choice of the chromatic signature.

Oppo Reno8 Pro 5G: Precise target exposure, wide dynamic range and depth of field

Samsung Galaxy A33 5G – slightly underexposed, wide dynamic range and depth of field

Xiaomi 11T – underexposure, wide dynamic range, shallow depth of field compared to Oppo and Samsung

Autofocus

108

Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max

Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max

Autofocus tests focus on focus accuracy, focus repeatability, shutter lag and depth of field. The shutter lag is the difference between the time the user presses the capture button and the time the image is actually taken. It includes focus speed and the ability of the device to capture images at the right moment, what is called “zero shutter lag” capability. While shallow depth of field can be nice for a single-subject portrait or close-up, it can also be a problem in some specific conditions such as group portraits; Both situations are tested. Focus accuracy is also evaluated in all real-life images taken, from infinity to close-up objects and in low light to outdoor conditions.

Autofocus irregularity and speed: 1000Lux Δ0EV Daylight Handheld

This graph illustrates focus accuracy and speed as well as zero shutter lag capability, showing edge sharpness versus shutter speed measured on the AFHDR setting over a series of images. All photos were taken at 1000 Lux with the Daylight Highlighter, 500ms after blurring. Edge sharpness is measured on the four edges of the Dead Leaves graph and shutter speed is measured on the Universal Timer LED.

Structure

102

Oppo Find X5

Oppo Find X5

Texture tests analyze the level of detail and texture of subjects in images taken in the laboratory as well as in real-life scenarios. For natural shots, special attention is paid to the level of detail in the light and dark areas of the image. Objective measurements are performed on map images taken under various lighting conditions from 1 to 1000 lux and different types of dynamic range conditions. The charts used are the proprietary SBMARK (DMC) chart and the Dead Leaves chart.

SBMARK CHART (DMC) detail retention score versus lux levels for tripod and handheld conditions

This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail retention score with the lux level, for two retention conditions. The DMC detail retention score is derived from an AI-based metric trained to evaluate texture and detail rendering on a selection of crops from our SBMARK chart.

Noise

94

Honor Magic4 Ultimate

Honor Magic4 Ultimate

Noise tests analyze various attributes of noise such as intensity, chromaticity, grain, texture on real-life images and graphical images taken in the laboratory. For natural images, special attention is paid to noise on faces, landscapes, but also on dark areas and high dynamic range conditions. Noise on moving objects is also evaluated on natural images. Objective measurements are performed on graphical images taken under various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux and different types of dynamic range conditions. The graph used is the Dead Leaves graph and standardized measurement such as visual noise derived from ISO 15739.

Evolution of visual noise with lighting levels in handheld condition

This graph shows the evolution of the visual noise metric with the lux level under portable conditions. The visual noise metric is the average of the visual noise measurement across all Dead Leaves chart patches in the AFHDR setting. SBMARK visual noise measurement is derived from the ISO15739 standard.

Manufactured goods

63

Google Pixel 6

Google Pixel 6

Artifact evaluation examines lens shading, chromatic aberrations, geometric distortion, edge ring, halos, ghosting, quantization, unexpected variations in color tone, among other types of possible unnatural effects on photos. The more severe and frequent the artifact, the greater the point deduction from the score. The main artifacts observed and the corresponding point loss are listed below.

Main penalties for photographic artifacts

Preview

125

Honor Magic4 Ultimate

Honor Magic4 Ultimate

The preview tests analyze the image quality of the camera app image preview, with particular attention to the difference between capture and preview, especially with regards to dynamic range and application of the bokeh effect. The smoothness of exposure, color and focus adaptation are also evaluated when zooming from the minimum to the maximum available zoom factor. The preview frame rate is measured using the Universal Timer LED.

Oppo Reno8 Pro 5G – preview – same exposure as the final acquisition

Oppo Reno8 Pro 5G: capture

Enlarge

74

Honor Magic4 Ultimate

Honor Magic4 Ultimate

Learn about SBMARK camera zoom tests

SBMARK engineers capture and evaluate over 400 test images in controlled laboratory environments and outdoor, indoor and natural scenes in low light conditions, using the camera’s default settings and zooming in at various zoom factors, from ultra wide angle to ultra-long range zoom. Evaluation is done by visually inspecting images Cons a natural scene reference and making objective measurements of graphs captured in the lab under different conditions from 20 to 1000 lux and color temperatures from 2300K to 6500K.

Oppo Reno8 Pro 5G zoom scores

This graph illustrates the relative scores for the different zoom ranges evaluated.

Wide

53

Honor Magic4 Ultimate

Honor Magic4 Ultimate

These tests analyze the performance of the ultra-wide-angle camera at different focal lengths from 12mm to 20mm. All image quality attributes are evaluated, with particular attention to artifacts such as chromatic aberrations, lens softness and distortion. The images below are an excerpt of tested scenes.

Oppo Reno8 Pro 5G: precise target exposure, desaturated colors, wide dynamic range

Samsung Galaxy A33 5G: precise target exposure, pleasant colors, wide dynamic range

Xiaomi 11T: precise target exposure, pleasant colors, wide dynamic range

Tele

56

Honor Magic4 Ultimate

Honor Magic4 Ultimate

All image quality attributes are evaluated at focal lengths from about 40mm to 300mm, with a focus on texture and detail. The score is derived from a series of objective measurements in the laboratory and from the perceptual analysis of real-life images.

SBMARK CHART (DMC) detail retention score by focal length

This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail retention score versus the full frame equivalent focal length for different lighting conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum details score of the retention metric – a higher value means better quality. The large dots correspond to the zoom ratio available in the camera application user interface.

SBMARK CHART (DMC) detail retention score by focal length

This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail retention score versus the full frame equivalent focal length for different lighting conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum details score of the retention metric – a higher value means better quality. The large dots correspond to the zoom ratio available in the camera application user interface.

SBMARK CHART (DMC) detail retention score by focal length

This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail retention score versus the full frame equivalent focal length for different lighting conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum details score of the retention metric – a higher value means better quality. The large dots correspond to the zoom ratio available in the camera application user interface.

SBMARK CHART (DMC) detail retention score by focal length

This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail retention score versus the full frame equivalent focal length for different lighting conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum details score of the retention metric – a higher value means better quality. The large dots correspond to the zoom ratio available in the camera application user interface.

video

111

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

About SBMARK Camera Video Tests

SBMARK engineers capture and evaluate over 2.5 hours of video in controlled laboratory environments and natural low-light scenes, indoor and outdoor, using the camera’s default settings. The assessment consists of visually inspecting natural videos taken under various conditions and carrying out objective measurements on graphical videos recorded in the laboratory under different conditions from 1 to 1000+ lux and color temperatures from 2,300 K to 6,500 K.

Video scores of Oppo Reno8 Pro 5G

Video tests analyze the same image quality attributes as still images, such as exposure, color, texture, or noise, as well as temporal aspects such as speed, exposure uniformity and stability, white balance, and autofocus transitions.

Exposure

90

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

Color

89

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

Exposure tests evaluate the brightness of the main subject and the dynamic range, eg. the ability to make details visible in both light and dark areas of the image. The stability and temporal adaptation of exposure are also analyzed.
Image Quality Color Analysis examines color rendition, skin tone rendition, white balance, color shading, white balance stability and adaptation when the light changes.

Oppo Reno8 Pro 5G: precise target exposure, wide dynamic range, exposure instability, good detail

Samsung Galaxy A33 5G: precise exposure of the target on portraits, wide dynamic range, slight loss of detail

Xiaomi 11T – underexposure, limited dynamic range, good detail

Structure

102

Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra

Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra

Consistency tests analyze the level of detail and texture of real-life videos, as well as graph videos recorded in the lab. Natural video recordings are evaluated visually, with particular attention to the level of detail in bright areas and dark areas. Objective measurements are performed on images of graphs taken under various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux. The charts used are the SBMARK (DMC) chart and the Dead Leaves chart.

SBMARK CHART (DMC) detail retention video score versus lux levels

This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail retention video score with the lux level in the video. The DMC detail retention score is derived from an AI-based metric trained to evaluate texture and detail rendering on a selection of crops from our SBMARK chart.

Noise

103

Samsung Galaxy A23 5G

Samsung Galaxy A23 5G

Noise tests analyze various noise attributes such as intensity, chromaticity, grain, texture, temporal aspects on real-life video recordings and graph videos taken in the laboratory. Natural videos are evaluated visually, with a focus on noise in dark areas and high dynamic range conditions. Objective measurements are performed on card videos recorded under various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux. The graph used is the SBMARK visual noise graph.

Spatial evolution of visual noise with the level of illuminance

This graph shows the evolution of spatial visual noise with the level of lux. Spatial visual noise is measured on the visual noise graph in the video noise setting. SBMARK visual noise measurement is derived from the ISO15739 standard.

Time evolution of visual noise with the level of illuminance

This graph shows the evolution of temporal visual noise with the level of lux. Visual temporal noise is measured on the visual noise graph in the video noise setting.

Stabilization

101

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

The stabilization assessment verifies the device’s ability to stabilize footage using software or hardware technologies such as OIS, EIS, or any other means. The assessment examines residual motion, smoothness, yellow artifacts, and residual motion blur in walking and running use cases under various lighting conditions. The video below is an excerpt from one of the tested scenes.

Oppo Reno8 Pro 5G – effective stabilization

Samsung Galaxy A33 5G: Noticeable camera movement

Xiaomi 11T: Slightly noticeable camera movement

Manufactured goods

77

Xiaomi 12S Ultra

Xiaomi 12S Ultra

Artifacts are evaluated with MTF and ring measurements on the SFR graph in the lab, as well as frame rate measurements using the Universal Timer LED. Natural videos are visually evaluated with special attention paid to artifacts such as aliasing, quantization, locking and toning, among others. The more severe and frequent the artifact, the greater the point deduction from the score. The main artifacts and the corresponding point loss are listed below.

Main penalties for video artifacts

Let's talk about "Oppo Reno8 Pro 5G Camera test" with our community!
Start a new Thread

Philip Owell

Professional blogger, here to bring you new and interesting content every time you visit our blog.